Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berrington, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, F. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berrington, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, F. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 597-603
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Review

Use of antibiotic locks to treat colonized central venous catheters

Andrew Berrington and F. Kate Gould,*

Department of Medical Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

Infections that result from bacterial colonization of central venous catheters are a significant problem in modern healthcare. The most effective means of eradication of such infections is the removal of colonized lines, but line removal carries drawbacks of its own and in many cases the balance of risks favours treatment in situ. Systemic antibiotics are usually administered but these frequently fail to achieve sterilization, and accordingly attention has turned to intraluminal therapy using antibiotic locks, in which 1–2 mL of a concentrated antibiotic solution is instilled to fill the lumen, left for a predetermined period, and removed. The evidence in favour of this technique is anecdotal and should not be allowed to influence any decision about line removal, but is sufficiently encouraging to justify the use of locks when in situ treatment is deemed acceptable. Indications, agents and appropriate administration regimes are discussed.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-191-223-1248; Fax: +44-191-223-1224; E-mail: kate.gould{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
Y. Qu, T. S. Istivan, A. J. Daley, D. A. Rouch, and M. A. Deighton
Comparison of various antimicrobial agents as catheter lock solutions: preference for ethanol in eradication of coagulase-negative staphylococcal biofilms
J. Med. Microbiol., April 1, 2009; 58(4): 442 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
W. Onland, C. E. Shin, S. Fustar, T. Rushing, and W.-Y. Wong
Ethanol-Lock Technique for Persistent Bacteremia of Long-term Intravascular Devices in Pediatric Patients.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2006; 160(10): 1049 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J.-Y. Lee, K. S. Ko, K. R. Peck, W. S. Oh, and J.-H. Song
In vitro evaluation of the antibiotic lock technique (ALT) for the treatment of catheter-related infections caused by staphylococci
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Fernandez-Hidalgo, B. Almirante, R. Calleja, I. Ruiz, A. M. Planes, D. Rodriguez, C. Pigrau, and A. Pahissa
Antibiotic-lock therapy for long-term intravascular catheter-related bacteraemia: results of an open, non-comparative study
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2006; 57(6): 1172 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
E. A. Krzywda and D. A. Andris
Twenty-five Years of Advances in Vascular Access: Bridging Research to Clinical Practice
Nutr Clin Pract, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 597 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Giacometti, O. Cirioni, R. Ghiselli, F. Orlando, F. Mocchegiani, C. Silvestri, A. Licci, M. De Fusco, M. Provinciali, V. Saba, et al.
Comparative Efficacies of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, Linezolid, Vancomycin, and Ciprofloxacin in Treatment, Using the Antibiotic-Lock Technique, of Experimental Catheter-Related Infection Due to Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2005; 49(10): 4042 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. Segarra-Newnham and E. M Martin-Cooper
Antibiotic Lock Technique: A Review of the Literature
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2005; 39(2): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Curtin, M. Cormican, G. Fleming, J. Keelehan, and E. Colleran
Linezolid Compared with Eperezolid, Vancomycin, and Gentamicin in an In Vitro Model of Antimicrobial Lock Therapy for Staphylococcus epidermidis Central Venous Catheter-Related Biofilm Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2003; 47(10): 3145 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Bailey, N. Berry, and J. S. Cheesbrough
Antimicrobial lock therapy for catheter-related bacteraemia among patients on maintenance haemodialysis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2002; 50(4): 615 - 617.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. M. Kuhn, T. George, J. Chandra, P. K. Mukherjee, and M. A. Ghannoum
Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Biofilms: Unique Efficacy of Amphotericin B Lipid Formulations and Echinocandins
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2002; 46(6): 1773 - 1780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Vardhan, J. Davies, I. Daryanani, A. Crowe, and P. McClelland
Treatment of haemodialysis catheter-related infections
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1149 - 1150.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.