Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boogaerts, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Beule, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boogaerts, M.
Right arrow Articles by De Beule, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 97-103
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Itraconazole versus amphotericin B plus nystatin in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients

Marc Boogaertsa,*, Johan Maertensa, Achiel van Hoofb, Robrecht de Bockc, Georges Filletd, Marc Peetermansc, Dominik Selleslagb, Bernard Vandercame, Koenraad Vandewoudef, Pierre Zachéeg and Karel De Beuleh

a Department of Hematology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Leuven; b University St Jan's Hospital, Bruges; c University Hospital, Antwerp, Edegem; d University Hospital Sart Tilman, Liège; e Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels; f University Hospital, Gent; g University Hospital, Antwerp; h Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium

The efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution and a combination of amphotericin B capsules plus nystatin oral suspension were compared in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic patients. In an open, randomized, multicentre trial, 144 patients received itraconazole oral solution 100 mg bd, and 133 patients received amphotericin B 500 mg tds plus nystatin 2 MU qds. Overall, 65% of itraconazole-treated patients were considered to have had successful prophylaxis, compared with 53% in the polyene group. Proven deep fungal infections occurred in 5% of patients in each group. Fewer patients receiving itraconazole than amphotericin plus nystatin had superficial infections (3 versus 8%; P = 0.066). This trend in favour of itraconazole was seen in patients with profound neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.1 x 109 cells/L at least once) or prolonged neutropenia (neutrophil count <1.0 x 109 cells/L for >14 days). The median time to prophylactic failure was longer in the itraconazole group (37 days) than in the polyene group (34 days). The number of patients with fungal colonization (nose, sputum, stool) changed more favourably from baseline to endpoint in the itraconazole group than in the polyene group. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated; however, patients receiving amphotericin plus nystatin had a higher incidence of nausea and rash. In conclusion, itraconazole oral solution at doses of 100 mg bd and oral amphotericin B plus nystatin have similar prophylactic efficacy against fungal infections in neutropenic patients. On the basis of reduced incidence of superficial fungal infections, fungal colonization and specific adverse events, itraconazole may be the preferred treatment.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +32-16-34-68-80; Fax: +32-16-34-68-81; E-mail: marc.boogaerts{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Robenshtok, A. Gafter-Gvili, E. Goldberg, M. Weinberger, M. Yeshurun, L. Leibovici, and M. Paul
Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5471 - 5489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
R. Dabur, T. K. Mandal, and G. L. Sharma
Post-antifungal effects of the antifungal compound 2-(3,4-dimethyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-1-methylethyl pentanoate on Aspergillus fumigatus
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2007; 56(6): 815 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
O. Penack, S. Schwartz, P. Martus, M. Reinwald, M. Schmidt-Hieber, E. Thiel, and I. W. Blau
Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia: results from a randomized, single-center trial
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 1306 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Glasmacher, O. Cornely, A. J. Ullmann, U. Wedding, H. Bodenstein, H. Wandt, C. Boewer, R. Pasold, H.-H. Wolf, M. Hanel, et al.
An open-label randomized trial comparing itraconazole oral solution with fluconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy and profound neutropenia
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2006; 57(2): 317 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Glasmacher, A. Prentice, M. Gorschluter, S. Engelhart, C. Hahn, B. Djulbegovic, and I. G.H. Schmidt-Wolf
Itraconazole Prevents Invasive Fungal Infections in Neutropenic Patients Treated for Hematologic Malignancies: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis of 3,597 Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2003; 21(24): 4615 - 4626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
O. A. Cornely, A. J. Ullmann, and M. Karthaus
Evidence-based assessment of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies
Blood, May 1, 2003; 101(9): 3365 - 3372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. E. Lewis, R. A. Prince, J. Chi, and D. P. Kontoyiannis
Itraconazole Preexposure Attenuates the Efficacy of Subsequent Amphotericin B Therapy in a Murine Model of Acute Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2002; 46(10): 3208 - 3214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.