Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by File, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by the 049 Clinical Study Group,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by File, T. M., Jr
Right arrow Articles by the 049 Clinical Study Group,
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 48, 67-74
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin

T. M. File, Jra,*, B. Schlemmerb, J. Garauc, M. Cupod, C. Youngd and the 049 Clinical Study Group{dagger}

a Summa Health System, Akron Infectious Disease Inc., 75 Arch Street, Suite 105 Akron, OH 44304, USA; b Hôpital St Louis, Paris, France; c Hospital Mutua de Terassa, Barcelona, Spain; d SmithKline Beecham, Collegeville, PA, USA

This multicentre, randomized, double blind, parallel group study compared the efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin (320 mg once daily) with trovafloxacin (200 mg once daily) in 571 patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Although treatment was given routinely for 7 days it could be extended to 14 days; two-thirds of patients were treated for 7 days. High clinical success rates were noted at follow-up in the per-protocol population in both the gemifloxacin group (95.8%) and the trovafloxacin group (93.6%), non-inferiority with 95% CI. In the intentto-treat population, the clinical success rate at follow-up was significantly superior for gemifloxacin (87.6%) compared with trovafloxacin (81.1%; 95% CI 0.5, 12.4). The pathogens identified most commonly at presentation were Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin eradicated 100% of S. pneumoniae. One bacteraemic isolate of S. pneumoniae was associated with clinical failure in the trovafloxacin group (MIC of trovafloxacin 8 mg/L). Gemifloxacin was well tolerated and the incidence of transient liver function abnormalities was very low. Gemifloxacin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CAP.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-330-375-3894: Fax: +1-330-375-3161; E-mail: filet{at}summa-health.org

{dagger} Members of the 049 Clinical Study Group are listed in the Acknowledgements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. N. Leonard, G. W. Kaatz, L. R. Rucker, and M. J. Rybak
Synergy between gemifloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2008; 62(6): 1305 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
I. Cochereau, P. Goldschmidt, A. Goepogui, T. Afghani, L. Delval, P. Pouliquen, T. Bourcier, and P.-Y. Robert
Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2007; 91(5): 667 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. A. Drehobl, M. C. De Salvo, D. E. Lewis, and J. D. Breen
Single-Dose Azithromycin Microspheres vs Clarithromycin Extended Release for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2230 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. Weiss and G. S. Tillotson
The Controversy of Combination vs Monotherapy in the Treatment of Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 940 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
K. B. Waites and D. F. Talkington
Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Its Role as a Human Pathogen
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 697 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. K Yoo, D. M Triller, C.-S. Yong, and T. P Lodise
Gemifloxacin: A New Fluoroquinolone Approved for Treatment of Respiratory Infections
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2004; 38(7): 1226 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
I. Morrissey and G. Tillotson
Activity of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 144 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Neumayr, E. Lennette, D. Kelly, A. Earles, S. Embury, P. Groncy, M. Grossi, R. Grover, L. McMahon, P. Swerdlow, et al.
Mycoplasma Disease and Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease
Pediatrics, July 1, 2003; 112(1): 87 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A. Ortqvist
Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in adults
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(36_suppl): 40S - 53s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. R. Hammerschlag
Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2001; 48(5): 735 - 735.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.