Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chopra, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 47, 647-650
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


Brief report

Mutation frequencies for resistance to fusidic acid and rifampicin in Staphylococcus aureus

Alex J. O'Neill, Jonathan H. Cove and Ian Chopra*,

Antimicrobial Research Centre and Division of Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Frequencies at which mutants resistant to fusidic acid and/or rifampicin arose in vitro were determined in Staphylococcus aureus strains including methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA) and hetero-VISA. The concentrations of fusidic acid (30 and 15 mg/L) and rifampicin (16 and 1 mg/L) used for selection were equal to the expected maximum and minimum serum concentrations after an oral regimen of rifampicin 900 mg od, together with fusidic acid 500 mg tds. Resistant mutants arose at a frequency of around 10-8 for selections with rifampicin, but were undetectable (frequency <10-11) for selections with fusidic acid. Mutants were not recovered (frequency <10-11) after selections in the presence of both fusidic acid and rifampicin at 30/16 and 15/1 mg/L. Our results suggest that these antibiotics, when used in combination, could have a wider role in the management of staphylococcal infections.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-113-233-5604; Fax: +44-113-233-5638; E-mail: i.chopra{at}leeds.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Miller, C. J. Dunsmore, C. W. G. Fishwick, and I. Chopra
Linezolid and Tiamulin Cross-Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Mediated by Point Mutations in the Peptidyl Transferase Center
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2008; 52(5): 1737 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. A. Vickers, A. J. O'Neill, and I. Chopra
Emergence and maintenance of resistance to fluoroquinolones and coumarins in Staphylococcus aureus: predictions from in vitro studies
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2007; 60(2): 269 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. K. Murphy, S. Mullin, M. S. Osburne, J. van Duzer, J. Siedlecki, X. Yu, K. Kerstein, M. Cynamon, and D. M. Rothstein
In Vitro Activity of Novel Rifamycins against Rifamycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2006; 50(3): 827 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
Y. Liu, J. Cui, R. Wang, X. Wang, K. Drlica, and X. Zhao
Selection of rifampicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus during tuberculosis therapy: concurrent bacterial eradication and acquisition of resistance
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1172 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A.-L. Prunier and R. Leclercq
Role of mutS and mutL Genes in Hypermutability and Recombination in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2005; 187(10): 3455 - 3464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Miller, C. Storey, W. J. Stubbings, A. M. Hoyle, J. K. Hobbs, and I. Chopra
Antistaphylococcal activity of the novel cephalosporin CB-181963 (CAB-175)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2005; 55(4): 579 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. G. Hurdle, A. J. O'Neill, E. Ingham, C. Fishwick, and I. Chopra
Analysis of Mupirocin Resistance and Fitness in Staphylococcus aureus by Molecular Genetic and Structural Modeling Techniques
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2004; 48(11): 4366 - 4376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Wullt and I. Odenholt
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of fusidic acid and metronidazole for treatment of an initial episode of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2004; 54(1): 211 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. Oliva, A. J. O'Neill, K. Miller, W. Stubbings, and I. Chopra
Anti-staphylococcal activity and mode of action of clofazimine
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2004; 53(3): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. G. Hurdle, A. J. O'Neill, and I. Chopra
The isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase mutation V588F conferring mupirocin resistance in glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus is not associated with a significant fitness burden
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2004; 53(1): 102 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. J. O'Neill, I. Chopra, G. Bierbaum, A. Reipert, and F. Schaaff
Lack of Evidence for Involvement of Hypermutability in Emergence of Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2003; 47(4): 1484 - 1485.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. W. Mason, A. J. Howard, and J. T. Magee
Fusidic acid resistance in community isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and fusidic acid prescribing
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2003; 51(4): 1033 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
B. Oliva, K. Miller, N. Caggiano, A. J. O'Neill, G. D. Cuny, M. Z. Hoemann, J. R. Hauske, and I. Chopra
Biological Properties of Novel Antistaphylococcal Quinoline-Indole Agents
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2003; 47(2): 458 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. J. O'Neill, J. M. Bostock, A. Morais Moita, and I. Chopra
Antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of resistance to cephalosporin P1, an antibiotic related to fusidic acid
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2002; 50(6): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. J. O'Neill and I. Chopra
Insertional inactivation of mutS in Staphylococcus aureus reveals potential for elevated mutation frequencies, although the prevalence of mutators in clinical isolates is low
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2002; 50(2): 161 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Miller, A. J. O'Neill, and I. Chopra
Response of Escherichia coli hypermutators to selection pressure with antimicrobial agents from different classes
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2002; 49(6): 925 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.