Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 47, 589-598
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
In vitro evaluation of the risk of developing bacterial resistance to antiseptics and antibiotics used in medical devices
Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, BB 1734, New York, NY 10032, USA
The risk of development of resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis to the antibiotics and antiseptics impregnated in central venous catheters was evaluated. The culture was passaged 1020 times through subinhibitory concentrations of different antimicrobials, singly and in combination, and the MIC of each antimicrobial before and after passage was compared. There was a 10- to 16-fold increase in the MIC of the combination of minocycline and rifampicin, while no significant increase in the MIC of minocycline alone was seen. The MIC of rifampicin was 25000-fold higher against strains passaged through rifampicin alone (as compared with that for the original strain), while the increase was only 80-fold when it was combined with minocycline for passage. There was no substantial change in susceptibility to the antiseptic chlorhexidine when used alone or in combination with either silver sulphadiazine or triclosan (the MIC of triclosan alone increased eight-fold). In timekill studies, synergy was observed between chlorhexidine and both triclosan and silver sulphadiazine. Zone of inhibition tests of catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampicin showed that their activity against rifampicin-resistant strains was lower than that against the susceptible strain. On the other hand, the activity of the antiseptic (chlorhexidine and silver sulphadiazine) catheters against the rifampicin-resistant and -susceptible strains was similar. Although this study indicates that antibiotic catheters may be at a higher risk of being colonized by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the implications of these results in clinical settings need to be determined.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-212-305-4060; Fax: +1-212-928-7400; E-mail: smm4{at}columbia.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Aslam and R. O. Darouiche Prolonged bacterial exposure to minocycline/rifampicin-impregnated vascular catheters does not affect antimicrobial activity of catheters J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2007; 60(1): 148 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Raad, H. Hanna, Y. Jiang, T. Dvorak, R. Reitzel, G. Chaiban, R. Sherertz, and R. Hachem Comparative Activities of Daptomycin, Linezolid, and Tigecycline against Catheter-Related Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteremic Isolates Embedded in Biofilm Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2007; 51(5): 1656 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Falagas, K. Fragoulis, I. A. Bliziotis, and I. Chatzinikolaou Rifampicin-impregnated central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 359 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cerca, S. Martins, S. Sillankorva, K. K. Jefferson, G. B. Pier, R. Oliveira, and J. Azeredo Effects of Growth in the Presence of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Dicloxacillin on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Biofilms Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 8677 - 8682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Rupp, S. J. Lisco, P. A. Lipsett, T. M. Perl, K. Keating, J. M. Civetta, L. A. Mermel, D. Lee, E. P. Dellinger, M. Donahoe, et al. Effect of a Second-Generation Venous Catheter Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine on Central Catheter-Related Infections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Ann Intern Med, October 18, 2005; 143(8): 570 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chaiban, H. Hanna, T. Dvorak, and I. Raad A rapid method of impregnating endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters with gendine: a novel antiseptic agent J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kampf and A. Kramer Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 863 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Gaonkar and S. M. Modak Comparison of microbial adherence to antiseptic and antibiotic central venous catheters using a novel agar subcutaneous infection model J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 389 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. I. Raad and H. A. Hanna Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections: New Horizons and Recent Advances Arch Intern Med, April 22, 2002; 162(8): 871 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





