Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tambe, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Modak, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tambe, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Modak, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2001) 47, 589-598
© 2001 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In vitro evaluation of the risk of developing bacterial resistance to antiseptics and antibiotics used in medical devices

S. M. Tambe, L. Sampath and S. M. Modak,*

Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, BB 1734, New York, NY 10032, USA

The risk of development of resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis to the antibiotics and antiseptics impregnated in central venous catheters was evaluated. The culture was passaged 10–20 times through subinhibitory concentrations of different antimicrobials, singly and in combination, and the MIC of each antimicrobial before and after passage was compared. There was a 10- to 16-fold increase in the MIC of the combination of minocycline and rifampicin, while no significant increase in the MIC of minocycline alone was seen. The MIC of rifampicin was 25000-fold higher against strains passaged through rifampicin alone (as compared with that for the original strain), while the increase was only 80-fold when it was combined with minocycline for passage. There was no substantial change in susceptibility to the antiseptic chlorhexidine when used alone or in combination with either silver sulphadiazine or triclosan (the MIC of triclosan alone increased eight-fold). In time–kill studies, synergy was observed between chlorhexidine and both triclosan and silver sulphadiazine. Zone of inhibition tests of catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampicin showed that their activity against rifampicin-resistant strains was lower than that against the susceptible strain. On the other hand, the activity of the antiseptic (chlorhexidine and silver sulphadiazine) catheters against the rifampicin-resistant and -susceptible strains was similar. Although this study indicates that antibiotic catheters may be at a higher risk of being colonized by antibiotic-resistant bacteria, the implications of these results in clinical settings need to be determined.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-212-305-4060; Fax: +1-212-928-7400; E-mail: smm4{at}columbia.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. Aslam and R. O. Darouiche
Prolonged bacterial exposure to minocycline/rifampicin-impregnated vascular catheters does not affect antimicrobial activity of catheters
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2007; 60(1): 148 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
I. Raad, H. Hanna, Y. Jiang, T. Dvorak, R. Reitzel, G. Chaiban, R. Sherertz, and R. Hachem
Comparative Activities of Daptomycin, Linezolid, and Tigecycline against Catheter-Related Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteremic Isolates Embedded in Biofilm
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2007; 51(5): 1656 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. E. Falagas, K. Fragoulis, I. A. Bliziotis, and I. Chatzinikolaou
Rifampicin-impregnated central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2007; 59(3): 359 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. Cerca, S. Martins, S. Sillankorva, K. K. Jefferson, G. B. Pier, R. Oliveira, and J. Azeredo
Effects of Growth in the Presence of Subinhibitory Concentrations of Dicloxacillin on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Biofilms
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 71(12): 8677 - 8682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. E. Rupp, S. J. Lisco, P. A. Lipsett, T. M. Perl, K. Keating, J. M. Civetta, L. A. Mermel, D. Lee, E. P. Dellinger, M. Donahoe, et al.
Effect of a Second-Generation Venous Catheter Impregnated with Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine on Central Catheter-Related Infections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, October 18, 2005; 143(8): 570 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
G. Chaiban, H. Hanna, T. Dvorak, and I. Raad
A rapid method of impregnating endotracheal tubes and urinary catheters with gendine: a novel antiseptic agent
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2005; 55(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
G. Kampf and A. Kramer
Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 863 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. A. Gaonkar and S. M. Modak
Comparison of microbial adherence to antiseptic and antibiotic central venous catheters using a novel agar subcutaneous infection model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 389 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
I. I. Raad and H. A. Hanna
Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections: New Horizons and Recent Advances
Arch Intern Med, April 22, 2002; 162(8): 871 - 878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.