Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marchese, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schito, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marchese, A.
Right arrow Articles by Schito, G. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 46, 11-15
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Comparative in vitro potency of gemifloxacin against European respiratory tract pathogens isolated in the Alexander Project

A. Marchese*, E. A. Debbia and G. C. Schito

Institute of Microbiology, University of Genoa Medical School, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy

European isolates collected in 1998 for the Alexander Project were tested for their susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and a novel fluoroquinolone, gemifloxacin, which has a spectrum of activity including common and atypical respiratory pathogens. MIC90s of gemifloxacin for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis were 0.03, 0.06 and 0.015 mg/L, respectively. On the basis of MIC90s, gemifloxacin was the most potent antimicrobial tested against S. pneumoniae and M. catarrhalis. Against H. influenzae, gemifloxacin was one tube dilution more potent than ofloxacin and one tube dilution less potent than ciprofloxacin. As resistance to currently available antimicrobial agents increases, gemifloxacin offers potential as a promising new agent for the treatment of respiratory tract infection.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +39-010-3537646 or 502136; Fax: +39-010-504837; E-mail: schitogc{at}aleph.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Doyle, E.-A. Feuerbaum, K. R. Fox, J. Hinds, D. E. Thurston, and P. W. Taylor
Response of Staphylococcus aureus to subinhibitory concentrations of a sequence-selective, DNA minor groove cross-linking pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2009; 64(5): 949 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
T. Nuryastuti, H. C. van der Mei, H. J. Busscher, S. Iravati, A. T. Aman, and B. P. Krom
Effect of Cinnamon Oil on icaA Expression and Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2009; 75(21): 6850 - 6855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. J. Stickler and G. L. Jones
Reduced Susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to Triclosan
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2008; 52(3): 991 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. Bayston, W. Ashraf, and T. Smith
Triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressed as small colony variants: a novel mode of evasion of susceptibility to antiseptics
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2007; 59(5): 848 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. F. Seaman, D. Ochs, and M. J. Day
Small-colony variants: a novel mechanism for triclosan resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2007; 59(1): 43 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
G. Kampf and A. Kramer
Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2004; 17(4): 863 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. E. Aiello, B. Marshall, S. B. Levy, P. Della-Latta, and E. Larson
Relationship between Triclosan and Susceptibilities of Bacteria Isolated from Hands in the Community
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2004; 48(8): 2973 - 2979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. K Yoo, D. M Triller, C.-S. Yong, and T. P Lodise
Gemifloxacin: A New Fluoroquinolone Approved for Treatment of Respiratory Infections
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2004; 38(7): 1226 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. D. Russell
Whither triclosan?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2004; 53(5): 693 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. B. Schmid and N. Kaplan
Reduced Triclosan Susceptibility in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2004; 48(4): 1397 - 1399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. Braoudaki and A. C. Hilton
Adaptive Resistance to Biocides in Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157 and Cross-Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2004; 42(1): 73 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. J. McBain, R. G. Bartolo, C. E. Catrenich, D. Charbonneau, R. G. Ledder, and P. Gilbert
Effects of Triclosan-Containing Rinse on the Dynamics and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of In Vitro Plaque Ecosystems
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2003; 47(11): 3531 - 3538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. D. Russell
Similarities and differences in the responses of microorganisms to biocides
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2003; 52(5): 750 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. J. Smith, D. Morrison, D. Robertson, M. K. Tang, and Z. Al-Doori
Efficacy of oral hygiene products against MRSA and MSSA isolates
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2003; 52(4): 738 - 739.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. Gilbert and A. J. McBain
Potential Impact of Increased Use of Biocides in Consumer Products on Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2003; 16(2): 189 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
Z. Al-Doori, D. Morrison, G. Edwards, and C. Gemmell
Susceptibility of MRSA to triclosan
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2003; 51(1): 185 - 186.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P. Gilbert, A. J. McBain, and S. F. Bloomfield
Biocide abuse and antimicrobial resistance: being clear about the issues
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2002; 50(1): 137 - 139.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.