Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCloskey, L.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCloskey, L.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 13
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In vitro activity of gemifloxacin against a broad range of recent clinical isolates from the USA

Lynn McCloskey, Terrance Moore, Nancy Niconovich, Brenda Donald, John Broskey, Charles Jakielaszek, Stephen Rittenhouse and Ken Coleman*

SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, PA, USA

The antibacterial potencies of gemifloxacin (SB-265805) and 13 comparator compounds were determined by broth microdilution against a panel of 645 Gram-positive and 995 Gram-negative organisms collected from various USA sites. Time–kill studies were performed and postantibiotic effect (PAE) was determined for several organisms using trovafloxacin and ciprofloxacin as comparator compounds. Based on MIC90s, gemifloxacin was the most potent compound tested against Gram-positive isolates: Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90 0.016 mg/L), Streptococcus agalactiae (0.03 mg/L), Streptococcus pyogenes (0.03 mg/L), viridans streptococci (0.12 mg/L), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (0.03 mg/L), Staphylococcus epidermidis (2 mg/L), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (0.016 mg/L) and Enterococcus faecalis (2 mg/L). Against Gram-negative isolates, the potency of gemifloxacin was equal to that of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and generally better than that of ofloxacin, grepafloxacin, trovafloxacin and nalidixic acid. MIC90s for gemifloxacin were: Haemophilus influenzae (<=0.008 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (0.008 mg/L), Escherichia coli (0.016 mg/L), Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.25 mg/L), Klebsiella oxytoca (0.25 mg/L), Enterobacter cloacae (1 mg/L), Enterobacter aerogenes (0.25 mg/L), Proteus spp. (4 mg/L), Serratia spp. (1 mg/L), Citrobacter freundii (2 mg/L), Morganella morganii (0.12 mg/L), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8 mg/L), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4 mg/L) and Acinetobacter spp. (32 mg/L). Gemifloxacin was bactericidal for all organisms studied at 2 and 4 x MIC. The PAE for most strains was in the range 0.7–2.5 h at 2 and 4 x MIC, although longer PAEs were observed with H. influenzae, P. aeruginosa and Proteus vulgaris (>6 h at 4 x MIC) and shorter PAEs with E. faecalis (0.1–0.6 h) and K. pneumoniae (0.1–0.2 h). In conclusion, gemifloxacin is a novel quinolone with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity. It has substantially improved potency against Gram-positive organisms, especially streptococci, for which gemifloxacin is generally at least eight- to 16-fold more potent than other quinolones tested. It retains the good Gram-negative activity seen with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin and shows good bactericidal activity and prolonged PAEs.

* Correspondence address. Microbiology Research, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 1250 S. Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426-0989, USA. Tel: +1-610-917-6273; Fax: +1-610-917-4617; E-mail: Kenneth_Coleman{at}SBPHRD.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A W Rimoin, H S Hamza, A Vince, R Kumar, C F Walker, R A Chitale, A L A da Cunha, S Qazi, and M C Steinhoff
Evaluation of the WHO clinical decision rule for streptococcal pharyngitis
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 1066 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. Y. Tani, L. G. Veasy, L. L. Minich, and R. E. Shaddy
Rheumatic Fever in Children Younger Than 5 Years: Is the Presentation Different?
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1065 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. E. Gieseker, M. H. Roe, T. MacKenzie, and J. K. Todd
Evaluating the American Academy of Pediatrics Diagnostic Standard for Streptococcus pyogenes Pharyngitis: Backup Culture Versus Repeat Rapid Antigen Testing
Pediatrics, June 1, 2003; 111(6): e666 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.