Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tran, J. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schentag, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tran, J. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Schentag, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 9-17
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Comparison of the abilities of grepafloxacin and clarithromycin to eradicate potential bacterial pathogens from the sputa of patients with chronic bronchitis: influence of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables

Jonathan Q. Trana, Charles H. Ballowa,*, Alan Forresta, Judith M. Hyatta, Mark F. Sandsb, Charles A. Peloquinc and Jerome J. Schentaga

a SUNY at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and the Clinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory; b Department of Medicine, Millard Fillmore Hospital/Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY; c National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO, USA

A randomized open-label study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of grepafloxacin with those of clarithromycin in patients with chronic bronchitis whose sputa were colonized with potential bacterial pathogens. Patients received oral grepafloxacin 400 mg od for 10 days (n = 15) or oral clarithromycin 500 mg bd for 10 days (n = 10). Sputum samples were collected before the first dose, 1, 4 and 8 h after a dose on day 1 and then before a dose on days 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10 to determine the time to eradication (Terad) of the potential bacterial pathogens. Blood samples for measurement of grepafloxacin or clarithromycin and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin concentrations were obtained before a dose and 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h after doses on days 1 and 5. The area under the inhibitory serum concentration–time curve over 24 h (AUIC24), peak serum concentration:MIC ratio (Cmax:MIC) and the percentage of the dosing interval during which the serum concentration exceeded the MIC (%{tau} >MIC) were calculated and serum inhibitory titres (SITs) were determined. Haemophilus spp. were the predominant potential bacterial pathogens and were recovered from the sputa of 24 patients. Strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae were isolated from two patients in the grepafloxacin group and a strain of Moraxella catarrhalis was isolated from one patient in the clarithromycin group. Haemophilus spp. isolates were eradicated from the sputa of 13 of 14 (93%) patients given grepafloxacin, but from only two of 10 (20%) patients given clarithromycin (P < 0.05). In the other eight (80%) patients who received clarithromycin, the sputum cultures remained positive throughout the 10 day course. Grepafloxacin eliminated potential bacterial pathogens more quickly than clarithromycin (median Terad 4 h versus 76 h). The S. pneumoniae strains were eradicated by grepafloxacin within 4 h and the single M. catarrhalis strain was eradicated by clarithromycin within 1 h. The greater efficacy of grepafloxacin, compared with that of clarithromycin, in terms of the incidence and speed of eradication of the Haemophilus spp. isolates, was associated with higher median values of AUIC24 (169 SIT–1•h versus 8.1 SIT–1•h), Cmax:MIC ratio (23.6 versus 0.7) and %{tau} >MIC (100% versus 0%). A Hill-type model adequately described the relationship between the percentage probability of eradicating potential bacterial pathogens from sputa and the plasma grepafloxacin concentration.

* Correspondence address. The Clinical Pharmacokinetics Laboratory, Millard Fillmore Health System, 3 Gates Circle, Buffalo, NY 14209, USA. Tel: +1-716-887-4583; Fax: +1-716-887-4566; E-mail: cballow{at}mfhs.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. D. Allan and T. J. Beveridge
Gentamicin Delivery to Burkholderia cepacia Group IIIa Strains via Membrane Vesicles from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2003; 47(9): 2962 - 2965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.