Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erjavec, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Daenen, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erjavec, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Daenen, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 843-849
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of empirical teicoplanin in febrile neutropenia with persistent fever after imipenem monotherapy

Zoran Erjaveca,{dagger}, Hilly G. de Vries-Hospersb, Marianne Laseurc, Ruud M. Haliea and Simon Daenena,*

a Department of Haematology, b Medical Microbiology and c Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

Glycopeptide antibiotics are used extensively in the empirical treatment of febrile patients with neutropenia. To come to a more rational and restricted application of these expensive drugs and to reduce the risk of emergence of resistance, we carried out a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled single-centre study to investigate whether the addition of teicoplanin improved the outcome of neutropenic patients who remained febrile after 72–96 h of imipenem monotherapy. Patients with known infections caused by imipenem-resistant microorganisms were excluded. From the 114 evaluable episodes (out of a total of 125) in 105 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 56 episodes were randomized to receive teicoplanin and 58 to placebo. At 72 h after the start of the assigned intervention, 52 (45.6%) of the patients were afebrile; at the end of the aplastic phase, 10 (8.8%) had succumbed. There was no difference between the two study arms. When febrile episodes were subdivided between microbiologically documented infections, clinically documented infections and fevers of unknown origin, again no significant differences were observed. With the exception of methicillin-resistant bacteria, Gram-positive infections seemed to respond well to imipenem monotherapy. It is concluded that the addition of teicoplanin on empirical grounds, i.e. for persistent fever only, is not necessary and that the use of glycopeptides should be restricted to well-defined clinical situations where methicillin-resistant bacteria are involved. Furthermore, it seems that many neutropenic patients respond slowly over more than 72–96 h even when they are treated with antibacterial drugs such as imipenem that are effective against the causative microorganism.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31-50-3616161; Fax: +31-50-3614862; E-mail: s.m.g.daenen{at}int.azg.nl

{dagger} Present address. Internal Medicine, Delfzicht Ziekenhuis, Jachtlaan 50, 9934 JD Delfzijl, The Netherlands.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. M. A. Blijlevens, R. M. Logan, and M. G. Netea
Mucositis: from febrile neutropenia to febrile mucositis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2009; 63(suppl_1): i36 - i40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Paul, S. Borok, A. Fraser, L. Vidal, and L. Leibovici
Empirical antibiotics against Gram-positive infections for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2005; 55(4): 436 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.