Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Bogaard, A. E. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stobberingh, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Bogaard, A. E. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stobberingh, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 663-671
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Antimicrobial resistance in pig faecal samples from The Netherlands (five abattoirs) and Sweden

A. E. J. M. van den Bogaard*, N. London and E. E. Stobberingh

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Maastricht, PO Box 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

The prevalence and degree of antibiotic resistance of faecal indicator bacteria, Escherichia coli and enteroccoci, were determined in 1321 faecal samples collected from pigs at five abattoirs in The Netherlands and in 100 samples from Swedish pigs. In the Dutch samples a high prevalence of resistance was observed in E. coli for three commonly used antibiotics in pig medicine, amoxycillin (70–94%), oxytetracycline (78–98%) and trimethoprim (62–96%). Also, the prevalence for chloramphenicol (55–67%) and neomycin (38–67%) was relatively high. For the other compounds tested the prevalence was less than 10%. The percentage of samples with a high degree of resistant E. coli showed the same tendency in all Dutch abattoirs although significant differences between the abattoirs were observed. The percentage of Swedish samples with a high degree of resistant E. coli was significantly lower for all antibiotics except nitrofurantoin, gentamicin, flumequin and ciprofloxacin. All enterococci were susceptible to amoxycillin and high-level resistance to gentamicin was observed in 4–6% of the Dutch samples. A high prevalence of resistance and a high degree of resistance was found for erythromycin and oxytetracycline. The prevalence of resistance to dalfopristin–quinupristin ranged from 6 to 8% and for vancomycin from 24 to 46%. Significant differences between the abattoirs were found for all compounds tested except amoxycillin. In the Swedish population both the prevalence and degree of resistance in enterococci were significantly lower except for amoxycillin and gentamicin. This point prevalence study showed that the prevalence and degree of antibiotic resistance in indicator bacteria, E. coli and enterococci, in faecal samples from pigs differed between two countries and reflected differences in antibiotic usage in pigs. To analyse the differences observed between the slaughterhouses, additional information about the farms of origin and antibiotic consumption is necessary.

1 Corresponding author. Tel: +31-43-3881015; Fax: +31-43-3670996; E-mail: A.vandenBogaard{at}CPV.Unimaas.NL


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Skurnik, A. Le Menac'h, D. Zurakowski, D. Mazel, P. Courvalin, E. Denamur, A. Andremont, and R. Ruimy
Integron-Associated Antibiotic Resistance and Phylogenetic Grouping of Escherichia coli Isolates from Healthy Subjects Free of Recent Antibiotic Exposure
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 3062 - 3065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Bruinsma, J. M. Hutchinson, A. E. van den Bogaard, H. Giamarellou, J. Degener, and E. E. Stobberingh
Influence of population density on antibiotic resistance
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2003; 51(2): 385 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Kijima-Tanaka, K. Ishihara, A. Morioka, A. Kojima, T. Ohzono, K. Ogikubo, T. Takahashi, and Y. Tamura
A national surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from food-producing animals in Japan
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2003; 51(2): 447 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. Bruinsma, R. J. L. Willems, A. E. van den Bogaard, M. van Santen-Verheuvel, N. London, C. Driessen, and E. E. Stobberingh
Different Levels of Genetic Homogeneity in Vancomycin-Resistant and -Susceptible Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Different Human and Animal Sources Analyzed by Amplified-Fragment Length Polymorphism
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2002; 46(9): 2779 - 2783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. E. van den Bogaard, R. Willems, N. London, J. Top, and E. E. Stobberingh
Antibiotic resistance of faecal enterococci in poultry, poultry farmers and poultry slaughterers
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2002; 49(3): 497 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. Jonkers, J. Swennen, N. London, C. Driessen, and E. Stobberingh
Influence of cefazolin prophylaxis and hospitalization on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the faecal flora
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2002; 49(3): 567 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. E. van den Bogaard, M. Hazen, M. Hoyer, P. Oostenbach, and E. E. Stobberingh
Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening P
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2002; 46(1): 110 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.