Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2000) 45, 31-39
© 2000 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Comparative in vitro activity of moxifloxacin against Gram-positive clinical isolates
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital St Radboud, University of Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 24, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
The in vitro activity of moxifloxacin was compared with that of 15 antibacterial agents against 513 Gram-positive microorganisms. The MIC90 (mg/L) of moxifloxacin was 0.06 for quinolone-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, 0.12 for Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae; 0.25 for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus anginosus and Actinomyces pyogenes; 0.5 for Streptococcus sanguis and Listeria monocytogenes, 2 for Corynebacterium jekeium and Bifidobacterium bivius. Over 50% of Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, quinolone-resistant staphylococci, Nocardia steroides and Clostridium difficile were susceptible to 2 mg/L moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin demonstrated comparably high activity towards Gram-positive cocci; moxifloxacin and clinafloxacin were most active against Gram-positive bacilli.
*Corresponding author. Tel: +31-24-36-14-356; Fax: +31-24-35-40-216; E-mail: j.hoogkamp{at}mmb.azn.nl
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mutlu, A. J. Wroe, K. Sanchez-Hurtado, J. S. Brazier, and I. R. Poxton Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitals in south-east Scotland J. Med. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 56(7): 921 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Frank, E. J. Reichert, K. E. Piper, and R. Patel In Vitro Effects of Antimicrobial Agents on Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Clinical Isolates Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 888 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Malincarne, M. Ghebregzabher, M. V. Moretti, A. M. Egidi, B. Canovari, G. Tavolieri, D. Francisci, G. Cerulli, and F. Baldelli Penetration of moxifloxacin into bone in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2006; 57(5): 950 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Vera-Cabrera, E. Y. Ochoa-Felix, G. Gonzalez, R. Tijerina, S. H. Choi, and O. Welsh In Vitro Activities of New Quinolones and Oxazolidinones against Actinomadura madurae Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2004; 48(3): 1037 - 1039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sauermann, R. Gattringer, W. Graninger, A. Buxbaum, and A. Georgopoulos Phenotypes of macrolide resistance of group A streptococci isolated from outpatients in Bavaria and susceptibility to 16 antibiotics J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2003; 51(1): 53 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Kaatz, V. V. Moudgal, and S. M. Seo Identification and characterization of a novel efflux-related multidrug resistance phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2002; 50(6): 833 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dridi, J. Tankovic, B. Burghoffer, F. Barbut, and J.-C. Petit gyrA and gyrB Mutations Are Implicated in Cross-Resistance to Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin in Clostridium difficile Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2002; 46(11): 3418 - 3421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Portier, J. Filipecki, P. Weber, G. Goldfarb, D. Lethuaire, and J.-P. Chauvin Five day clarithromycin modified release versus 10 day penicillin V for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized study J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2002; 49(2): 337 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ackermann, Y. J. Tang, R. Kueper, P. Heisig, A. C. Rodloff, J. Silva Jr., and S. H. Cohen Resistance to Moxifloxacin in Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Isolates Is Associated with Mutations in gyrA Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2001; 45(8): 2348 - 2353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


