Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Höffken, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Höffken, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 44, 367-376
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

An open, randomized, multicentre study comparing the use of low-dose ceftazidime or cefotaxime, both in combination with netilmicin, in febrile neutropenic patients

G. Höffkena,*, R. Pasoldb, K. H. Pflügerc, J. Finked, A. A. Fausere, H. Szelenyia, J. Wagnerf and the German Multicentre Study Group,{dagger}

a Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D 12203, Berlin; b Klinikum Ernst-von-Bergmann, Potsdam; c Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg; d Medizinisches Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg i. Br.; e Klinik für Knochenmarkstransplantation und Hämatologie/Onkologie, Idar-Oberstein; f Institut für Infektionsmedizin, Berlin, Germany

To reduce drug acquisition costs, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of low-dose ceftazidime iv (1 g tid) was compared with cefotaxime iv (2 g tid). Both regimens were combined with netilmicin iv (2 mg/kg bodyweight tid), in an open, randomized, multicentre trial in febrile neutropenic patients. The addition of antibiotics for Gram-positive coverage was part of the protocol; alteration in the antibiotics for Gram-negative cover or premature discontinuation of the study antibiotics were judged as failure. One hundred and eighty six patients were randomized by nine German centres, the patients matched for age, underlying diseases and duration of neutropenia (median duration 14 days) in both treatment arms. Infections were documented microbiologically in 29% of the patients, clinically in 16% and suspected (fever of unknown origin) in 102/186 patients (55%). The 82 pathogens isolated were predominantly Gram-positive bacteria. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate without modification at the final evaluation was 58% in the ceftazidime group and 34% in the cefotaxime group (P < 0.01). The success rates with modification were 84% and 64%, respectively. The failure rate in a highly immunosuppressed subgroup of the patients (bone marrow transplant recipients) was higher for cefotaxime (53%) than for the ceftazidime arm (14%) (P < 0.001). Response rates were significantly higher in the ceftazidime group for patients with microbiologically documented and possible infections. No major bacterial superinfections occurred in the low-dose treatment arm. The tolerability was good for both regimens. Low-dose ceftazidime combined with netilmicin proved to be superior to recommended doses of cefotaxime/netilmicin in febrile neutropenic patients.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-30-8445-2680; Fax: +49-30-8445-2349; E-mail: Hoeffken{at}ukbf.fu-berlin.de

{dagger} Additional members of the Multicentre Study Group: principal investigator (number of patients). Fauser, A., Idar-Oberstein (n = 28); Finke, J., Freiburg (n = 30); Grüneisen, A., Berlin(n = 6); Höfeler, H., Witten (n = 6); Pasold, R., Potsdam (n = 59); Petrasch, S., Bochum (n = 3); Pflüger, K.H., Marburg (n = 30); Respondek, M., Stuttgart (n = 2); Thiel, E./Höffken, G., Berlin (n = 22).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.