Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butler, T.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 44, 243-250
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Treatment of typhoid fever with azithromycin versus chloramphenicol in a randomized multicentre trial in India

Thomas Butlera,*, C. B. Sridharb, M. K. Dagac, Kamal Pathakd, R. B. Pandite, Rasik Khakhriaf, Chandrashekhar N. Potkarg, Michael T. Zelaskyh and Raymond B. Johnsonh

a Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA b Saint John's Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore c Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi d Baroda Hospital, Baroda e Central Railway Hospital, Bombay, India f Bureau of Microbiology, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada g Pfizer Limited, Bombay, India h Central Research Division, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA

To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacies of azithromycin and chloramphenicol for treatment of typhoid fever, 77 bacteriologically evaluable adults, with blood cultures positive for Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi A susceptible to their assigned drugs, were entered into a randomized open trial at four hospitals in India. Forty-two patients were randomized to receive azithromycin 500 mg po od for 7 days and 35 to receive chloramphenicol 2–3 g po od in four divided doses for 14 days. Thirty-seven patients (88%) in the azithromycin group responded with clinical cure or improvement within 8 days and 30 patients (86%) in the chloramphenicol group responded with cure or improvement. By day 14 after the start of treatment, all patients treated with azithromycin and all except two of the patients treated with chloramphenicol (94%) were cured or improved. Blood cultures repeated on day 8 after start of therapy showed eradication of organisms in 100% of patients in the azithromycin group and 94% of patients in the chloramphenicol group. By day 14 the eradication rate in the chloramphenicol group had increased to 97%. Stool cultures on days 21 and 35 after start of treatment showed no prolonged faecal carriage of Salmonella spp. in either group. These results indicate that azithromycin given once daily for 7 days was effective therapy for typhoid fever in a region endemic with chloramphenicol-resistant S. typhi infection and was equivalent in effectiveness to chloramphenicol given to patients with chloramphenicol-susceptible infections.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-806-743-3155; Fax: +1-806-743-3148.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
M. R. Capoor, D. Nair, J. Posti, S. Singhal, M. Deb, P. Aggarwal, and P. Pillai
Minimum inhibitory concentration of carbapenems and tigecycline against Salmonella spp.
J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2009; 58(3): 337 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
M. R. Capoor, D. Rawat, D. Nair, A. S. Hasan, M. Deb, P. Aggarwal, and P. Pillai
In vitro activity of azithromycin, newer quinolones and cephalosporins in ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella causing enteric fever
J. Med. Microbiol., November 1, 2007; 56(11): 1490 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. M. Parry, V. A. Ho, L. T. Phuong, P. V. B. Bay, M. N. Lanh, L. T. Tung, N. T. H. Tham, J. Wain, T. T. Hien, and J. J. Farrar
Randomized Controlled Comparison of Ofloxacin, Azithromycin, and an Ofloxacin-Azithromycin Combination for Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Nalidixic Acid-Resistant Typhoid Fever
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2007; 51(3): 819 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. M. Parry, T. T. Hien, G. Dougan, N. J. White, and J. J. Farrar
Typhoid Fever
N. Engl. J. Med., November 28, 2002; 347(22): 1770 - 1782.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Butler
Effect of increased inoculum of Salmonella typhi on MIC of azithromycin and resultant growth characteristics
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2001; 48(6): 903 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. Butler, R. W. Frenck, R. B. Johnson, and R. Khakhria
In vitro effects of azithromycin on Salmonella typhi: early inhibition by concentrations less than the MIC and reduction of MIC by alkaline pH and small inocula
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2001; 47(4): 455 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. T. Chinh, C. M. Parry, N. T. Ly, H. D. Ha, M. X. Thong, T. S. Diep, J. Wain, N. J. White, and J. J. Farrar
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Azithromycin and Ofloxacin for Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant or Nalidixic Acid-Resistant Enteric Fever
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2000; 44(7): 1855 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.