Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Maesen, F. P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davies, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Maesen, F. P. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, Suppl. C, 83-90
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Clinical effectiveness of levofloxacin in patients with acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: the relationship with in-vitro activity

B. I. Davies* and F. P. V. Maesen

Departments of Medical Microbiology and Respiratory Diseases, Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands

The objective of this randomized, double-blind study was to compare the clinical efficacy of levofloxacin at two different dosages with that of cefuroxime axetil in patients with acute purulent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and, in particular, to assess the impact of the susceptibility to levofloxacin on the clinical findings. In total, 124 evaluable patients were treated for 7 days with oral levofloxacin 250 mg or 500 mg od, or cefuroxime axetil 250 mg bd. Sputum cultures were monitored pre-treatment, and at 1 and 7 days after the end of treatment. The susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates was tested by agar dilution in Columbia blood agar and by disc diffusion, but all other isolates were tested solely by the disc diffusion method. A greater number of infections were eradicated by levofloxacin than by cefuroxime axetil: infections were eradicated in 68% of patients receiving the 500 mg dosage and in 63% of those taking 250 mg levofloxacin, whereas the eradication rate with the comparator drug was much lower (48%). Against all pre-treatment S. pneumoniae isolates (n = 39), the MICs of levofloxacin were between 0.25 and 2 mg/L (geometric mean 0.95 mg/L), similar to those of the post-treatment strains (n = 32; mean 1.11 mg/L). All except one of the S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to penicillin G (MIC <= 0.06 mg/L), and the remaining isolate was inhibited by 0.5 mg/L of penicillin G, but was fully susceptible to levofloxacin. Some pre-treatment strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistant to levofloxacin, but many more resistant strains were encountered afterwards. All strains of Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae were highly susceptible to levofloxacin in the disc diffusion tests. All the antimicrobial agents used in the study were well tolerated: only two patients discontinued treatment because of adverse drug effects. The results of this study indicated that, although there were some failures in patients with S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa infections, resistance to levofloxacin did not emerge rapidly among strains of S. pneumoniae during therapy with levofloxacin, and that natural resistance among pneumococci, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis was rare.

* Corresponding author. Tel:+31-45-576-7803; Fax: +31-45-576-7098.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
A. M. Noreddin, V. L. Haynes, and G. G. Zhanel
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the New Quinolones
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2005; 18(6): 432 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. P. Ittner, G. Roth, M. Gruber, M. Pawlik, and K. Taeger
Clearance of moxifloxacin during continuous haemofiltration (CVVHF) in vitro
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2005; 56(2): 360 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. A. Firsov, I. Y. Lubenko, S. N. Vostrov, Y. A. Portnoy, and S. H. Zinner
Antistaphylococcal Effect Related to the Area under the Curve/MIC Ratio in an In Vitro Dynamic Model: Predicted Breakpoints versus Clinically Achievable Values for Seven Fluoroquinolones
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 2642 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Tano, O. Cars, and E. Lowdin
Pharmacodynamic studies of moxifloxacin and erythromycin against intracellular Legionella pneumophila in an in vitro kinetic model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2005; 56(1): 240 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Sethi, J. Breton, and B. Wynne
Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacokinetically Enhanced Amoxicillin-Clavulanate at 2,000/125 Milligrams Twice Daily for 5 Days versus Amoxicillin-Clavulanate at 875/125 Milligrams Twice Daily for 7 Days in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2005; 49(1): 153 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
H. Lode, J. Eller, A. Linnhoff, M. Ioanas, and the Evaluation of Therapy-Free Interval in COPD Pa
Levofloxacin versus clarithromycin in COPD exacerbation: focus on exacerbation-free interval
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2004; 24(6): 947 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
V. Fuhrmann, P. Schenk, W. Jaeger, S. Ahmed, and F. Thalhammer
Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2004; 54(4): 780 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
I.E. Liapakis, I. Kottakis, M.N. Tzatzarakis, A.M. Tsatsakis, M.S. Pitiakoudis, P. Ypsilantis, R.W. Light, C.E. Simopoulos, and D.E. Bouros
Penetration of newer quinolones in the empyema fluid
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2004; 24(3): 466 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. J. Bast, M. Yue, X. Chen, D. Bell, L. Dresser, R. Saskin, L. A. Mandell, D. E. Low, and J. C. S. de Azavedo
Novel Murine Model of Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Use of Temperature as a Measure of Disease Severity To Compare the Efficacies of Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2004; 48(9): 3343 - 3348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Croisier, M. Etienne, E. Bergoin, P.-E. Charles, C. Lequeu, L. Piroth, H. Portier, and P. Chavanet
Mutant Selection Window in Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin Treatments of Experimental Pneumococcal Pneumonia in a Rabbit Model of Human Therapy
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2004; 48(5): 1699 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
B. B. Ba, H. Feghali, C. Arpin, M.-C. Saux, and C. Quentin
Activities of Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Emergence of Resistant Mutants in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2004; 48(3): 946 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. H. Cynamon and M. Sklaney
Gatifloxacin and Ethionamide as the Foundation for Therapy of Tuberculosis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2003; 47(8): 2442 - 2444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
I. Mahmood, M. D. Green, and J. E. Fisher
Selection of the First-Time Dose in Humans: Comparison of Different Approaches Based on Interspecies Scaling of Clearance
J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2003; 43(7): 692 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.