Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Block, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Block, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, Suppl. C, 15-19
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

In-vitro activity of levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with various levels of penicillin resistance

K. S. Thomsona,*, S. A. Chartranda, C. C. Sandersa and S. L. Blockb

a Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska b Kentucky Pediatric Research, Bardstown, Kentucky, USA

This in-vitro study was designed to compare the activity of levofloxacin with that of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, erythromycin, penicillin, amoxycillin, loracarbef, cefaclor, cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole, clindamycin and vancomycin against a collection of 202 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (56% susceptible to penicillin, 34% intermediate, 10% resistant). The isolates (60% nasopharyngeal, 40% middle ear) were obtained from otherwise healthy children at child care centres in urban and rural Nebraska, and at a paediatric clinic in rural Kentucky. MICs were determined by NCCLS agar dilution methodology using an inoculum of 10 4 cfu/spot. Using NCCLS breakpoints, the percentage of penicillin- intermediate and -resistant strains susceptible to the evaluable agents were, respectively, as follows: levofloxacin (99%, 100%), ofloxacin (87%, 100%), erythromycin (52%, 65%), ceftriaxone (93%, 25%), trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole (7%, 0%), clindamycin (93%, 100%) and vancomycin (100%, 100%). Without NCCLS interpretive criteria, no conclusions could be made concerning the susceptibility of penicillin-intermediate and -resistant strains to the other study drugs. All ß-lactam antibiotics, erythromycin and trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole were less active against penicillin-resistant strains, indicating that these may be suboptimal agents for empirical therapy for suspected S. pneumoniae infections in these patient populations. However, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, clindamycin and vancomycin were equally active against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains. These data suggest that the efficacy of levofloxacin should be examined in both adult and paediatric S. pneumoniaeinfections involving body sites where levofloxacin concentrations >2 mg/L can be achieved safely.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1-402-280-1881; Fax: +1-402-280-1225; E-mail: kstaac{at}creighton.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. K. Shukla, S. V. Ramaswamy, J. Conradt, M. E. Stemper, R. Reich, K. D. Reed, and E. A. Graviss
Novel Polymorphisms in mec Genes and a New mec Complex Type in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Obtained in Rural Wisconsin
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2004; 48(8): 3080 - 3085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. E. Rosato, B. N. Kreiswirth, W. A. Craig, W. Eisner, M. W. Climo, and G. L. Archer
mecA-blaZ Corepressors in Clinical Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2003; 47(4): 1460 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.