Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, Suppl. B, 31-37
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
The effect of moxifloxacin on its target topoisomerases from Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus
Pharmaceutical Microbiology, University of bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 168, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
The effect of moxifloxacin on its target enzymes was evaluated by three different
approaches: (i) the MICs of moxifloxacin and nine other fluoroquinolones were determined for
mutants of Escherichia coli (n = 13) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5) carrying different combinations of resistance mutations; (ii) the
activity of moxifloxacin on isolated targets was determined as IC 50 values for
wild-type and mutant type II topoisomerases from E. coli; and (iii) the mutation
frequencies were determined for two single-step mutants (MI with a Ser83
Leu mutation in gyrA and WT-4 with a Ser80
Ile mutation in parC) and their parent strain
(WT). Of the quinolones tested, moxifloxacin was the only one showing an equivalent high
activity against both targets. This is reflected by a comparable high susceptibility of the test
strains of E. coli and S. aureus and by the IC 50 values of
moxifloxacin which were 5090% lower than those of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and
sparfloxacin for the wild-type and single mutant enzymes of gyrase and topoisomerase IV.
However, double mutant GyrA was significantly more sensitive to moxifloxacin than to the other
fluoroquinolones tested, while wild-type topoisomerase IV was two-fold more refractory.
Mutation rates of WT, MI and WT-4 for ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin were 5 x 10-8 vs 4 x 10-10, <6 x 10-11 vs <6 x 10-11; and 2 x 10 -6 vs 5 x 10-7, respectively. These data indicate an
equivalenthigh inhibitory activity of moxifloxacin on DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV of E. coli.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49-228-735267.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Cambau, S. Matrat, X.-S. Pan, R. Roth Dit Bettoni, C. Corbel, A. Aubry, C. Lascols, J.-Y. Driot, and L. M. Fisher Target specificity of the new fluoroquinolone besifloxacin in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2009; 63(3): 443 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, K. L. Tyrrell, Y. A. Warren, H. Fernandez, and E. J. C. Goldstein In Vitro Activities of Ramoplanin, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, Linezolid, Bacitracin, and Four Other Antimicrobials against Intestinal Anaerobic Bacteria Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2003; 47(7): 2334 - 2338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Price, A. Vogler, T. Pearson, J. D. Busch, J. M. Schupp, and P. Keim In Vitro Selection and Characterization of Bacillus anthracis Mutants with High-Level Resistance to Ciprofloxacin Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2003; 47(7): 2362 - 2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ince, X. Zhang, and D. C. Hooper Activity of and Resistance to Moxifloxacin in Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2003; 47(4): 1410 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

