Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iravani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Echols, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iravani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Echols, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, Suppl. A, 67-75
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

A trial comparing low-dose, short-course ciprofloxacin and standard 7 day therapy with co-trimoxazole or nitrofurantoin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection

Abdollah Iravania,*, Ira Klimbergb, Caesar Brieferc, Catherine Munerad, Steven F. Kowalskye, Roger M. Echolse,{dagger} and the Urinary Tract Infection Group,{ddagger}

a Central Florida Medical Research Center, Orlando, FL b The Urology Center of Florida, Ocala, FL c University of Michigan Health Service, Ann Arbor, MI d Synergex Inc., Greenwich, CT e Bayer Corporation, Pharmaceutical Division, West Haven, CT, USA

The study was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of twice-daily ciprofloxacin for 3 days with standard 7 day therapy with either co-trimoxazole or nitrofurantoin in the treatment of women with acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI). This multicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial compared oral ciprofloxacin (100 mg bd) for 3 days with co-trimoxazole (160/800 mg bd) or nitrofurantoin (100 mg bd) for 7 days. Bacteriological and clinical evaluations were performed at study entry, during therapy and 4-10 days and 4-6 weeks after the completion of therapy. The primary efficacy parameter was eradication of the causative organism 4- 10 days following treatment. Of 713 women enrolled and evaluable for safety, 521 were evaluable for efficacy (168 ciprofloxacin, 174 co-trimoxazole, 179 nitrofurantoin). Escherichia coli (83%) was the most frequently isolated pathogen in all treatment groups. Bacteriological eradication was reported in 88% of ciprofloxacin patients, 93% of co-trimoxazole patients and 86% of nitrofurantoin patients. At the 4-6 week follow-up, ciprofloxacin had statistically significantly higher eradication rates (91%) than co-trimoxazole (79%; 95% confidence limit (CL) = -20.6%, -3.9%) and nitrofurantoin (82%; 95% CL = -17.1%, -0.9%). Clinical resolution 4- 10 days after therapy and at the 4- 6 week follow-up was similar among the three treatment groups. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was not significantly different (P= 0.093) among the three drug regimens, althousgh co-trimoxazole was associated with a greater number of adverse events than ciprofloxacin (P <=0.05). Ciprofloxacin also caused fewer episodes of nausea than either of the other agents (P <=0.01).

* Corresponding address: 615 East Princeton Street, Orlando, FL 32803, USA. Tel: +1-407-898-2811; Fax: +1-407-898-6044.

{dagger} Current address: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT, USA.

{ddagger} See Acknowledgements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Gupta, T. M. Hooton, P. L. Roberts, and W. E. Stamm
Short-Course Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis in Women
Arch Intern Med, November 12, 2007; 167(20): 2207 - 2212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
L. G. Miller and A. W. Tang
Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in an Era of Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance
Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2004; 79(8): 1048 - 1054.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.