Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 817-824
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Fluconazole, with or without dexamethasone for experimental cryptococcosis: impact of treatment timing
a Unité de Mycologie, Institut Pasteur, 25, rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15; b Service de Pharmaco-Toxicologie, Centre de Recherches en Pathologie Infectieuse et Tropicale, CREPIT 93, Hôpital Avicenne, Université Paris-Nord, 125, route de Stalingrad, 93009 Bobigny-Cedex, France
The time of initiation of fluconazole treatment with or without dexamethasone, and the impact on mycological outcome and drug pharmacokinetics were assessed in a murine model of disseminated cryptococcosis. Non-infected mice and mice with disseminated cryptococcosis were given saline, dexamethasone, or fluconazole ± dexamethasone, 1 or 8 days after infection. Cfus were counted in tissues, and fluconazole concentrations were determined in plasma and tissues by HPLC and a bioassay. Despite fluconazole tissue and plasma concentrations which were above the minimal inhibitory concentration, the numbers of cfus in brain and lung tissues were reduced after early (P= 0.002 and 0.04, respectively), but not after late fluconazole treatment. The administration of dexamethasone did not have a deleterious effect on the number of cfus, fluconazole pharmacokinetics or antifungal activity. In conclusion, the size of the fungal burden influences the effective level of fluconazole activity in lung and brain. These results strongly suggest that potential antifungal agents should be studied following both early and late administration in experimental cryptococcosis.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +33-1-40-61-33-89; Fax: +33-1-45-68-84-20; E-mail: dromer{at}pasteur.fr
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Dannaoui, M. Abdul, M. Arpin, A. Michel-Nguyen, M. A. Piens, A. Favel, O. Lortholary, F. Dromer, and the French Cryptococcosis Study Group Results Obtained with Various Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Methods Do Not Predict Early Clinical Outcome in Patients with Cryptococcosis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2006; 50(7): 2464 - 2470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schwarz, F. Dromer, O. Lortholary, and E. Dannaoui Efficacy of Amphotericin B in Combination with Flucytosine against Flucytosine-Susceptible or Flucytosine-Resistant Isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans during Disseminated Murine Cryptococcosis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 113 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Larsen, M. Bauer, A. M. Thomas, A. Sanchez, D. Citron, M. Rathbun, and T. S. Harrison Correspondence of In Vitro and In Vivo Fluconazole Dose-Response Curves for Cryptococcus neoformans Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2005; 49(8): 3297 - 3301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Fries, E. Cook, X. Wang, and A. Casadevall Effects of Antifungal Interventions on the Outcome of Experimental Infections with Phenotypic Switch Variants of Cryptococcus neoformans Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2005; 49(1): 350 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
