Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrews, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1999) 43, 689-698
© 1999 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive pathogens isolated in the UK between October 1996 and January 1997

J. Andrewsa,*, J. Ashbya, G. Jevonsa, N. Linesb and R. Wisea

a Department of Medical Microbiology; and b Pathology Computing Department, City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive pathogens from 30 centres in the UK (ten Teaching, ten Associate Teaching and ten District General Hospitals) was studied over a 4 month period between October 1996 and January 1997. High-level resistance (HLR) and low-level resistance (LLR) to penicillin amongst pneumococci was 3.3% and 3.4%, respectively. However, considerable variation in resistance rates was observed depending on geographical location (LLR range 0-15.4% and HLR range 0-30.8%). Considerable variation in resistance rates was also observed for Staphylococcus aureus to methicillin, with rates ranging from 0% to 56.7% depending on locality. Using conventional MIC methodology, none of the isolates of S. aureus was considered as having reduced sensitivity to vancomycin. However, eight isolates grew on Brain Heart Infusion Agar containing vancomycin (4 mg/L) after prolonged incubation and are therefore worthy of further investigation by electron microscopy. With Enterococcus faecalis, resistance rates were similar between the three types of hospital and only four isolates were considered resistant to glycopeptide antibiotics (one vanA and three vanB phenotype).

* Corresponding author. Tel: +44-121-544-3801; Fax: +44-121-551-7763.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. J. O'Neill, A. R. Larsen, R. Skov, A. S. Henriksen, and I. Chopra
Characterization of the Epidemic European Fusidic Acid-Resistant Impetigo Clone of Staphylococcus aureus
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2007; 45(5): 1505 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. J. Petersen, T. Z. Wang, R. G. Dushin, and P. A. Bradford
Comparative In Vitro Activities of AC98-6446, a Novel Semisynthetic Glycopeptide Derivative of the Natural Product Mannopeptimycin {alpha}, and Other Antimicrobial Agents against Gram-Positive Clinical Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2004; 48(3): 739 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
R. R. Reinert, S. Muckel, A. Al-Lahham, B. G. Spratt, A. B. Brueggemann, R. Hakenbeck, and R. Lutticken
Characterization of German penicillin non-susceptible serotype 23F pneumococci using multilocus sequence typing
J. Med. Microbiol., November 1, 2003; 52(11): 981 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. Butaye, L. A. Devriese, and F. Haesebrouck
Antimicrobial Growth Promoters Used in Animal Feed: Effects of Less Well Known Antibiotics on Gram-Positive Bacteria
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2003; 16(2): 175 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
P. J. Petersen, P. A. Bradford, W. J. Weiss, T. M. Murphy, P. E. Sum, and S. J. Projan
In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Tigecycline (GAR-936), Daptomycin, and Comparative Antimicrobial Agents against Glycopeptide-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and Other Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2595 - 2601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. J. Henwood, M. Warner, P. Waight, A. P. Johnson, R. C. George, and D. M. Livermore
Accuracy of routine susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae in England and Wales
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2001; 47(6): 897 - 900.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. J. O'Neill, J. H. Cove, and I. Chopra
Mutation frequencies for resistance to fusidic acid and rifampicin in Staphylococcus aureus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 647 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. J. Henwood, D. M. Livermore, A. P. Johnson, D. James, M. Warner, A. Gardiner, and The Linezolid Study Group
Susceptibility of Gram-positive cocci from 25 UK hospitals to antimicrobial agents including linezolid
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2000; 46(6): 931 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
R. H. Drew, J. R. Perfect, L. Srinath, E. Kurkimilis, M. Dowzicky, G. H. Talbot, and for the Synercid Emergency-Use Study Group
Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections with quinupristin-dalfopristin in patients intolerant of or failing prior therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2000; 46(5): 775 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Andrews, J. Ashby, G. Jevons, T. Marshall, N. Lines, and R. Wise
A comparison of antimicrobial resistance rates in Gram-positive pathogens isolated in the UK from October 1996 to January 1997 and October 1997 to January 1998
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2000; 45(3): 285 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.