Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 42, 179-187, Copyright © 1998 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
KS Thomson and CC Sanders
A panel of 266 clinically isolated Gram-positive cocci and Gram- negative
bacilli with varying levels of resistance to ciprofloxacin were analysed
for susceptibility to Du-6859a, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, temafloxacin and
nalidixic acid. Staphylococci were divided into ciprofloxacin-susceptible,
moderately resistant and highly resistant subgroups. Du-6859a was the most
potent quinolone against all taxa. As ciprofloxacin resistance increased to
high levels, MICs of all quinolones increased but Du-6859a MICs increased
least, and ciprofloxacin MICs increased most. Less susceptible single-step
mutants were selected from 80% of 15 representative clinical isolates
exposed to ciprofloxacin, 71% of isolates exposed to temafloxacin, 67% of
isolates exposed to Du-6859a and 53% of isolates exposed to ofloxacin.
Du-6859a inhibited more mutants (67%) at a concentration of 1 mg/L than did
the other quinolones (26-43%) at their susceptible breakpoints. Du- 6859a
was the most rapidly bactericidal quinolone in time-kill studies with
Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. This study indicated that
Du-6859a is more potent than the comparator quinolones, is less affected by
the mechanisms responsible for high-level quinolone resistance and may be
less likely to select resistant mutants if it has a susceptible breakpoint
of 1 mg/L.
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
The effects of increasing levels of quinolone resistance on in-vitro activity of four quinolones
Center for Research in Anti-Infectives & Biotechnology, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NB 68178, USA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Entenza, Y. A. Que, J. Vouillamoz, M. P. Glauser, and P. Moreillon Efficacies of Moxifloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, and Vancomycin against Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Expressing Various Degrees of Ciprofloxacin Resistance Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2001; 45(11): 3076 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Thomson Minimizing quinolone resistance: are the new agents more or less likely to cause resistance? J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2000; 45(6): 719 - 723. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pong, K. S. Thomson, E. S. Moland, S. A. Chartrand, and C. C. Sanders Activity of moxifloxacin against pathogens with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 1999; 44(5): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Brisse, A. C. Fluit, U. Wagner, P. Heisig, D. Milatovic, J. Verhoef, S. Scheuring, K. Köhrer, and F.-J. Schmitz Association of Alterations in ParC and GyrA Proteins with Resistance of Clinical Isolates of Enterococcus faecium to Nine Different Fluoroquinolones Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1999; 43(10): 2513 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

