Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tomioka, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sato, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tomioka, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 41, 77-83, Copyright © 1998 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Antimicrobial activities of benzoxazinorifamycin KRM-1648, clarithromycin and levofloxacin against intracellular Mycobacterium avium complex phagocytosed by murine peritoneal macrophages

K Sato, T Akaki and H Tomioka
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Shimane Medical University, Japan.

The in-vitro activities of KRM-1648, a new benzoxazinorifamycin, clarithromycin and levofloxacin against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) were measured using various methods of assay and compared with their in-vivo therapeutic activities against MAC infection in mice. The MICs varied according to drug in the order KRM-1648 << clarithromycin < levofloxacin. However, KRM-1648 and clarithromycin but not levofloxacin had similar therapeutic outcomes in MAC-infected mice. KRM-1648 and clarithromycin given at clinical dosages caused 1 to 2 log unit reductions in bacterial loads in the lungs of host mice. The values of Cmax (lung)/MBC were more closely related to the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs in mice than were MICs and MBCs alone. Potent microbicidal activity was observed with KRM- 1648 and clarithromycin but not with levofloxacin against extracellularly growing MAC (EG-MAC) in a liquid medium. These two agents caused more than 3 log unit killing of MAC during a 5 day incubation, when added at concentrations equivalent to Cmax (lung). The anti-EG-MAC bactericidal activity of these drugs was greater than their efficacy in mice in vivo. KRM-1648 and clarithromycin but not levofloxacin caused respectively 2 and 0.5 log unit killing of intracellularly growing MAC (IG-MAC) in murine peritoneal macrophages. The profiles of bacterial killing effects of these agents against IG- MAC accurately reflected their therapeutic effects in mice, although the in-vivo activity of KRM-1648 was still overestimated using even this parameter.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. Cai, K. Sato, T. Shimizu, S. Yamabe, M. Hiraki, C. Sano, and H. Tomioka
Antimicrobial activity of picolinic acid against extracellular and intracellular Mycobacterium avium complex and its combined activity with clarithromycin, rifampicin and fluoroquinolones
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 85 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Sano, H. Tomioka, K. Sato, C. Sano, H. Kawauchi, S. Cai, and T. Shimizu
Interaction of Antimycobacterial Drugs with the Anti-Mycobacterium avium Complex Effects of Antimicrobial Effectors, Reactive Oxygen Intermediates, Reactive Nitrogen Intermediates, and Free Fatty Acids Produced by Macrophages
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2004; 48(6): 2132 - 2139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H. Tomioka, K. Sato, H. Kajitani, T. Akaki, and S. Shishido
Comparative Antimicrobial Activities of the Newly Synthesized Quinolone WQ-3034, Levofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, and Ciprofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium Complex
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2000; 44(2): 283 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
H. Tomioka, K. Sato, T. Akaki, H. Kajitani, S. Kawahara, and M. Sakatani
Comparative In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of the Newly Synthesized Quinolone HSR-903, Sitafloxacin (DU-6859a), Gatifloxacin (AM-1155), and Levofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium Complex
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 1999; 43(12): 3001 - 3004.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Sato and H. Tomioka
Antimicrobial activities of benzoxazinorifamycin (KRM-1648) and clarithromycin against Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex within murine peritoneal macrophages, human macrophage-like cells and human alveolar epithelial cells
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 1999; 43(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Sano, T. Shimizu, K. Sato, H. Kawauchi, S. Kawahara, and H. Tomioka
Therapeutic Effects of Benzoxazinorifamycin KRM-1648 Administered Alone or in Combination with a Half-Sized Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor or the Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Diclofenac Sodium against Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection in Mice
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 1999; 43(2): 360 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. T. E. Suller and D. Lloyd
Flow Cytometric Assessment of the Postantibiotic Effect of Methicillin on Staphylococcus aureus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 1998; 42(5): 1195 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.