Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barchiesi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Scalise, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 41, 59-65, Copyright © 1998 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

In-vitro interaction of terbinafine with amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole against clinical isolates of Candida albicans

F Barchiesi, LF Di Francesco, P Compagnucci, D Arzeni, A Giacometti and G Scalise
Institute of Infectious Diseases & Public Health, University of Ancona, Italy.

A chequerboard titration broth microdilution method, performed according to the recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, was applied to study the in-vitro interaction of terbinafine with amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole against 30 strains of Candida albicans isolated from the oral cavities of AIDS patients. MICs were determined spectrophotometrically at 490 nm and read at either 24 h or 48 h. The end-point was defined as the drug concentration resulting in > or = 90% inhibition of growth relative to control growth. Synergy, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index of < or = 0.50, was observed in 93% (28 of 30) of terbinafine-amphotericin B interactions, in 47% (14 of 30) of terbinafine-fluconazole interactions and in 43% (13 of 30) of terbinafine-itraconazole interactions; antagonism (FIC > 2.0) was not observed. Where synergy was not achieved, there was still a decrease, although not as dramatic, in the MIC of one or both drugs when used in combination. Reading the MICs on day 2 did not significantly affect the mode of interaction of terbinafine-triazoles, while for terbinafine- amphotericin B the proportion of synergic interactions dropped from 93% (28 of 30) to 30% (nine of 30; P = 0.0001). Antagonism was not observed for any drug combination even at 48 h. Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of all drugs alone and in combination were determined against five isolates. Neither terbinafine nor the two triazoles showed fungicidal activity when tested alone or in combination. The fungicidal activity of amphotericin B was slightly enhanced when combined with terbinafine, there being a decrease of two- fold dilutions in the amphotericin B MFCs against all five isolates tested. Thus terbinafine enhances the activities of amphotericin B and triazoles against C. albicans in vitro. Clearly, clinical studies are warranted to elucidate further the potential utility of these combination therapies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Infection ControlHome page
M. Madeo, E. Owen, and J. Baruah
The management of Clostridium difficile infection: using small-scale audit to indicate the knowledge of nursing and medical staff in an acute hospital setting
Journal of Infection Prevention, May 1, 2008; 9(3): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
Q. Guo, S. Sun, J. Yu, Y. Li, and L. Cao
Synergistic activity of azoles with amiodarone against clinically resistant Candida albicans tested by chequerboard and time-kill methods
J. Med. Microbiol., April 1, 2008; 57(4): 457 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Sun, Y. Li, Q. Guo, C. Shi, J. Yu, and L. Ma
In Vitro Interactions between Tacrolimus and Azoles against Candida albicans Determined by Different Methods
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 409 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Meletiadis, J. W. Mouton, J. F. G. M. Meis, and P. E. Verweij
In Vitro Drug Interaction Modeling of Combinations of Azoles with Terbinafine against Clinical Scedosporium prolificans Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 106 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
W. R. Kirkpatrick, S. Perea, B. J. Coco, and T. F. Patterson
Efficacy of Caspofungin Alone and in Combination with Voriconazole in a Guinea Pig Model of Invasive Aspergillosis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2564 - 2568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Dannaoui, J. Afeltra, J. F. G. M. Meis, and P. E. Verweij
In Vitro Susceptibilities of Zygomycetes to Combinations of Antimicrobial Agents
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2708 - 2711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. Perea, G. Gonzalez, A. W. Fothergill, D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi
In Vitro Activities of Terbinafine in Combination with Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, and Posaconazole against Clinical Isolates of Candida glabrata with Decreased Susceptibility to Azoles
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2002; 40(5): 1831 - 1833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. T. A. Te Dorsthorst, P. E. Verweij, J. F. G. M. Meis, N. C. Punt, and J. W. Mouton
Comparison of Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index with Response Surface Modeling for Characterization of In Vitro Interaction of Antifungals against Itraconazole-Susceptible and -Resistant Aspergillus fumigatus Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., March 1, 2002; 46(3): 702 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. B. Moore, C. M. Walls, and D. W. Denning
In Vitro Activities of Terbinafine against Aspergillus Species in Comparison with Those of Itraconazole and Amphotericin B
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2001; 45(6): 1882 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
D. DRUDY, D.P. O'DONOGHUE, A. BAIRD, L. FENELON, and C. O'FARRELLY
Flow cytometric analysis of Clostridium difficile adherence to human intestinal epithelial cells
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2001; 50(6): 526 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
P.B. Kroker, M. Bower, and B. Azadian
Clostridium difficile infection, hospital geography and time-space clustering
QJM, April 1, 2001; 94(4): 223 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
F. Barbut, A. Richard, K. Hamadi, V. Chomette, B. Burghoffer, and J.-C. Petit
Epidemiology of Recurrences or Reinfections of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2000; 38(6): 2386 - 2388.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. E. Kuipers, H. G. de Vries, M. C. Eikelboom, D. K. F. Meijer, and P. J. Swart
Synergistic Fungistatic Effects of Lactoferrin in Combination with Antifungal Drugs against Clinical Candida Isolates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 1999; 43(11): 2635 - 2641.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
B. Favre, M. Didmon, and N. S. Ryder
Multiple amino acid substitutions in lanosterol 14{alpha}-demethylase contribute to azole resistance in Candida albicans
Microbiology, October 1, 1999; 145(10): 2715 - 2725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. Barchiesi, D. Gallo, F. Caselli, L. F. Di Francesco, D. Arzeni, A. Giacometti, and G. Scalise
In-vitro interactions of itraconazole with flucytosine against clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 1999; 44(1): 65 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.