Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langan, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pettit, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langan, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pettit, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 63-72, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Randomized, double-blind study of grepafloxacin versus amoxycillin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

CE Langan, R Cranfield, S Breisch and R Pettit
Baillieston Health Centre, Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, University of Glasgow, UK.

This randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of grepafloxacin and amoxycillin in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Patients were randomized to receive grepafloxacin 400 mg or 600 mg od, or amoxycillin 500 mg tds, for 7 or 10 days. The trial recruited 656 patients, of whom 566 (86%) completed the study. Clinical success rates at the 2 week follow-up visit for the population evaluable for clinical efficacy were 82% (165/202 patients) in the grepafloxacin 400 mg group, 85% (175/206) in the grepafloxacin 600 mg group and 85% (172/203 patients) in the amoxycillin group. The 95% confidence interval confirmed the equivalence of the two grepafloxacin doses and amoxycillin, with no significant difference between the grepafloxacin groups. The microbiological success rates at follow-up showed equivalence between the grepafloxacin 400 mg and amoxycillin groups: 86% (144/168 isolates) and 83% (162/195), respectively. The grepafloxacin 600 mg group achieved a statistically significantly higher eradication rate (92%, 150/164; 95% CI 2.0%, 16.1%) than the amoxycillin group in the follow- up assessment for microbiological and clinical efficacy (evaluable population). There was no significant difference between the two grepafloxacin treatment groups (95% CI -13.3%, 0.9%; P= 0.087). All three treatment regimens successfully eradicated the pathogens most commonly isolated during the study, including Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Grepafloxacin had a good safety profile, comparable to that of amoxycillin, although grepafloxacin 600 mg was associated with a higher incidence of nausea, dyspepsia and taste perversion than amoxycillin. It can be concluded that grepafloxacin 400 mg or 600 mg od is as effective as amoxycillin 500 mg tds in the treatment of ABECB.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Woodhead, F. Blasi, S. Ewig, G. Huchon, M. Leven, A. Ortqvist, T. Schaberg, A. Torres, G. van der Heijden, and T. J. M. Verheij
Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2005; 26(6): 1138 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. F. Murphy, A. L. Brauer, B. J. B. Grant, and S. Sethi
Moraxella catarrhalis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Burden of Disease and Immune Response
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2005; 172(2): 195 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. Sethi and T. F. Murphy
Bacterial Infection in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in 2000: a State-of-the-Art Review
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2001; 14(2): 336 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. V. Hirschmann, T. F. Murphy, S. Sethi, and M. S. Niederman
Bacteria and COPD Exacerbations Redux
Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 663 - 667.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Georgopoulos, M. Borek, W. Ridl, and T. Amoxycillin Bronchitis Study Group
Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing the efficacy and safety of amoxycillin 1 g bd with amoxycillin 500 mg tds in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2001; 47(1): 67 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. D. Cubbon and R. G. Masterton
New quinolones--a fresh answer to the pneumococcus
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2000; 46(6): 869 - 872.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. M. Gerber, L. Tovar, M. Cottagnoud, K. A. Neftel, M. G. Tauber, and P. Cottagnoud
Grepafloxacin against penicillin-resistant pneumococci in the rabbit meningitis model
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2000; 46(2): 249 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. V. Hirschmann
Do Bacteria Cause Exacerbations of COPD?
Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 193 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. M. Legg and A. J. Bint
Will pneumococci put quinolones in their place?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 1999; 44(4): 425 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. E. Langan, P. Zuck, F. Vogel, A. McIvor, W. Pierzchala, M. Smakal, H. Staley, and C. Marr
Randomized, double-blind study of short-course (5 day) grepafloxacin versus 10 day clarithromycin in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 1999; 44(4): 515 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
New fluoroquinolone antibiotics
DTB, January 1, 1999; 37(1): 6 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.