Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Espersen, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knudsen, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Espersen, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 679-686, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Comparison of the effect of cefepime with four cephalosporins against pneumococci with various susceptibilities to penicillin, in vitro and in the mouse peritonitis model

JD Knudsen, K Fuursted, N Frimodt-Moller and F Espersen
Department of Research and Development, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen-S, Denmark.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect, both in vitro and in vivo, of cefepime with those of four other cephalosporins, namely ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cephalothin, against penicillin- resistant pneumococci. One hundred pneumococcal strains, 31 penicillin- susceptible, 30 penicillin-intermediate-resistant and 39 penicillin- resistant pneumococci, were used in MIC studies. Time-kill experiments were carried out for four strains. In the mouse peritonitis model, the dose that gave protection to 50% of mice challenged with a lethal dose of pneumococci (ED50) was determined for three pneumococci and five cephalosporins. The MICs of all five cephalosporins and penicillin correlated significantly with each other. In vitro, the most potent cephalosporins against pneumococci were cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefepime, followed by cefuroxime and cephalothin. In time-kill experiments, carried out for four pneumococci, no differences were found in the killing effect of these five cephalosporins in relation to MICs. In the mouse peritonitis model, there was no significant correlation between log(MIC) and log(ED50) for the five cephalosporins against three pneumococci (Spearman's rho = 0.39, P = 0.16). However, if the values for cefepime against the three pneumococci were excluded, there was a significant correlation for the remaining four cephalosporins (Spearman's rho = 0.62, P = 0.04). For all three pneumococci, the ED50s of cefepime were lower than expected from the MICs. It was not possible to explain this beneficial difference in the effect of cefepime in terms of in-vitro bactericidal activities, serum protein binding or pharmacodynamic parameters.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.