Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kraaijeveld, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hustinx, W. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kraaijeveld, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 567-572, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Evaluation of protection by two endotoxin-neutralizing IgM monoclonal antibodies in different peritonitis models

WN Hustinx, BJ Benaissa-Trouw, T Harmsen, S Klein, J Verhoef, AI Hoepelman and K Kraaijeveld
Eijkman-Winkler Institute for Medical & Clinical Microbiology, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.

Two anti-core glycolipid (CGL) IgM monoclonal antibodies (mAbs 8-2 and 26-20), previously shown to display cross-reactivity with heterologous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro and to provide cross-protectivity against endotoxin challenge in vivo, were evaluated for their potential to protect mice against death from peritonitis caused by heterologous bacterial challenge. Without concurrent antibiotic treatment neither antibody was protective. Compared with a control mAb, prophylactic treatment with mAb 8-2 significantly increased the survival of gentamicin-treated mice challenged with the rough strain Salmonella minnesota Re595. Both mAb 8-2 and a control mAb, in combination with a suboptimal dose of ceftazidime, increased survival following challenge with the clinical isolate Escherichia coli O7:K1. In a model of mucin- enhanced peritonitis, neither mAb was protective against challenge with inocula of E. coli O7:K1, ranging from 10(2) to 10(4) bacteria. We conclude that protection of mice by anti-CGL mAb 8-2 against heterologous challenge is vitally dependent on concurrent treatment with antibiotics and that protection may not be attributable to the anti-CGL specificity of these antibodies.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.