Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deguchi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kawada, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 543-549, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Detection of mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in quinolone- resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacter cloacae

T Deguchi, M Yasuda, M Nakano, S Ozeki, E Kanematsu, Y Nishino, S Ishihara and Y Kawada
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Japan.

We have determined partial sequences of the gyrA and parC genes of Enterobacter cloacae type strain including the regions analogous to the quinolone resistance-determining region of the Escherichia coli gyrA gene. The deduced 65- and 49-amino acid sequences of the determined regions of the E. cloacae gyrA and parC genes were identical to the corresponding regions of the E. coli GyrA and ParC proteins, respectively. We examined 40 clinical strains of E. cloacae isolated from patients with urinary tract infection for susceptibilities to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. Based on the nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin MICs, these isolates were divided into 19 quinolone- susceptible strains (MICs of nalidixic acid, 3.13-25 mg/L; MICs of ciprofloxacin, < or = 0.025 mg/L) and 21 quinolone-resistant strains (MICs of nalidixic acid, 400 to > 800 mg/L; MICs of ciprofloxacin, 0.39- 100 mg/L). We analysed five quinolone-susceptible and 21 quinolone- resistant strains for alterations in GyrA and ParC. The five quinolone- susceptible strains had amino acid sequences in GyrA and ParC identical to those of type strain. Of the 21 quinolone-resistant isolates, three (MICs of nalidixic acid, 400 to > 800 mg/L; MICs of ciprofloxacin, 0.39- 3.13 mg/L) had a single amino acid change at the position equivalent to Ser-83 in the E. coli GyrA protein and no alterations in ParC; one (MIC of nalidixic acid, > 800 mg/L; MIC of ciprofloxacin, 3.13 mg/L) had a single amino acid change at Ser-83 in GyrA and a single amino acid change at the position equivalent to Glu-84 in the E. coli ParC protein; two (MIC of nalidixic acid, > 800 mg/L; MIC of ciprofloxacin, 25 mg/L) had double amino acid changes at Ser-83 and Asp-87 in GyrA and no alterations in ParC; and 15 (MICs of nalidixic acid, > 800 mg/L; MICs of ciprofloxacin, 25-100 mg/L) had double amino acid changes at Ser-83 and Asp-87 in GyrA and a single amino acid change at Ser-80 or Glu-84 in ParC. This study suggests, that in clinical isolates of E. cloacae, DNA gyrase is a primary target of quinolones, that only a single amino acid change at Ser-83 in GyrA is sufficient to generate high-level resistance to nalidixic acid and to decrease susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, and that the accumulation of amino acid changes in GyrA and the simultaneous presence of the ParC alterations play a central role in developing high-level resistance to ciprofloxacin.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. J. Gonzalez-Lopez, M. Sabate, S. Lavilla, M. N. Larrosa, R. M. Bartolome, and G. Prats
In Vivo Reversion to the Wild-Type {beta}-Lactam Resistance Phenotype Mediated by a Plasmid Carrying ampR and qnrA1 in Enterobacter cloacae.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2006; 50(9): 3175 - 3178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. L. Marcusson, S. K. Olofsson, P. K. Lindgren, O. Cars, and D. Hughes
Mutant prevention concentrations of ciprofloxacin for urinary tract infection isolates of Escherichia coli
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2005; 55(6): 938 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
H.-J. Linde, F. Notka, C. Irtenkauf, J. Decker, J. Wild, H.-H. Niller, P. Heisig, and N. Lehn
Increase in MICs of ciprofloxacin in vivo in two closely related clinical isolates of Enterobacter cloacae
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2002; 49(4): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
H. Schumacher, J. Scheibel, and J. K. Moller
Cross-resistance patterns among clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae with decreased susceptibility to cefuroxime
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2000; 46(2): 215 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Brisse, D. Milatovic, A. C. Fluit, J. Verhoef, N. Martin, S. Scheuring, K. Köhrer, and F.-J. Schmitz
Comparative In Vitro Activities of Ciprofloxacin, Clinafloxacin, Gatifloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, and Trovafloxacin against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae, and Enterobacter aerogenes Clinical Isolates with Alterations in GyrA and ParC Proteins
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 1999; 43(8): 2051 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. M. Weigel, C. D. Steward, and F. C. Tenover
gyrA Mutations Associated with Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Eight Species of Enterobacteriaceae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1998; 42(10): 2661 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.