Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eby, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eby, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 483-493, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Zinc ion availability--the determinant of efficacy in zinc lozenge treatment of common colds

GA Eby
George Eby Research, Austin, TX 78704, USA. coldcure@bga.com

This is a re-analysis of reports from 1984 to 1992 of double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials of zinc lozenges in the treatment of common colds. This re-analysis was performed to test the hypothesis that major variations in daily zinc ion availability (ZIA) between chemically different lozenge formulations caused differing results in these clinical trials. Solution chemistry computations determined the bioavailability of Zn2+ ions at physiological pH from the lozenges used in these clinical trails. ZIA was derived from Fick's laws of diffusion in a bio-electric field. Lozenges that released Zn2+ ions at physiological pH (positive ZIAs) shortened colds. Lozenges that released negatively charged zinc species at physiological pH (negative ZIAs) lengthened colds. Lozenges having a zero ZIA had no effect on common colds. Lozenges with ZIA = 100 shortened colds by 7 days while ZIA = -55 lozenges lengthened colds by 4.4 days. A linear dose-response relationship exists between ZIAs of zinc lozenges and changes in duration of common colds. It is concluded that: prospective efficacy of zinc lozenges can be predicted based upon readily determined ZIA factors and ZIAs; chemically different zinc lozenge formulations having greatly different ZIAs resulted in greatly differing results in clinical trials; mast cell granule-derived Zn2+ ions are the foundation of the primary immune system; and high ZIA zinc acetate lozenges are beneficial for common colds.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
E. A Yetley
Multivitamin and multimineral dietary supplements: definitions, characterization, bioavailability, and drug interactions
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 269S - 276S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
S.B. Mossad
Effect of zincum gluconicum nasal gel on the duration and symptom severity of the common cold in otherwise healthy adults
QJM, January 1, 2003; 96(1): 35 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
N. J Baker
Daily zinc supplements reduced the incidence and severity of acute lower respiratory infections in children in India
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 1999; 2(1): 12 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
N. J Baker
Zinc gluconate lozenges were not effective for treating the common cold in children and adolescents
Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 1999; 2(1): 13 - 13.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Gadomski
A Cure for the Common Cold?: Zinc Again
JAMA, June 24, 1998; 279(24): 1999 - 2000.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. B. Mossad and J. L. Jackson
Another Look at a Meta-analysis of Zinc Salts Lozenges and the Common Cold
Arch Intern Med, May 11, 1998; 158(9): 1038 - 1040.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.