Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oh, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 269-273, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Intermittent bolus dosing of ceftazidime in critically ill patients

RJ Young, J Lipman, T Gin, CD Gomersall, GM Joynt and TE Oh
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories.

Ceftazidime is frequently used in critically ill patients, particularly for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The recommended dosing regimen is based on pharmacokinetic data obtained in healthy volunteers and may not be appropriate in the critically ill. We administered ceftazidime in the maximum recommended dose (2 g i.v. every 8 h) to ten critically ill patients with normal plasma creatinine. Eighteen arterial blood samples were taken from each patient over the first 8 h for measurement of ceftazidime concentrations and subsequent compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. An additional trough sample was taken from each patient on day 3. Although mean pharmacokinetic variables did not differ from previously reported data in normal volunteers there was wide variability in plasma drug concentrations. Three of our patients had plasma ceftazidime concentrations less than the MIC for P. aeruginosa (8 mg/L) and nine had concentrations less than 5 x MIC, which has been recommended to ensure efficacy. On day 3 trough ceftazidime concentrations were less than the MIC in four out of the seven patients in whom measurements were made and less than 5 x MIC in the remaining three. There was no clinical predictor of which patients would have low plasma concentrations. Our results show that plasma concentrations of ceftazidime are very variable when the recommended intermittent bolus dosing regimen is used and may result in inadequate plasma concentrations of drug in critical infections. This may result in treatment failure and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. A loading dose followed by continuous infusion should overcome these problems but this awaits in-vivo evaluation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. M. M. Y. Li, C. D. Gomersall, G. Choi, Q. Tian, G. M. Joynt, and J. Lipman
A systematic review of antibiotic dosing regimens for septic patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: do current studies supply sufficient data?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2009; 64(5): 929 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
B. Georges, J.-M. Conil, T. Seguin, S. Ruiz, V. Minville, P. Cougot, J.-F. Decun, H. Gonzalez, G. Houin, O. Fourcade, et al.
Population Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Influence of Glomerular Filtration Rate, Mechanical Ventilation, and Reason for Admission
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 2009; 53(10): 4483 - 4489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. L Crandon, J. L Kuti, R. N Jones, and D. P Nicolau
Comparison of 2002-2006 OPTAMA Programs for US Hospitals: Focus on Gram-Negative Resistance
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2009; 43(2): 220 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Lipman, S. C. Wallis, and R. J. Boots
Cefepime Versus Cefpirome: The Importance of Creatinine Clearance
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1149 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. L. C. E. Buijk, I. C. Gyssens, J. W. Mouton, A. Van Vliet, H. A. Verbrugh, and H. A. Bruining
Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in serum and peritoneal exudate during continuous versus intermittent administration to patients with severe intra-abdominal infections
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2002; 49(1): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
F. Traunmuller, P. Schenk, C. Mittermeyer, R. Thalhammer-Scherrer, K. Ratheiser, and F. Thalhammer
Clearance of ceftazidime during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2002; 49(1): 129 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. H. Kollef and V. J. Fraser
Antibiotic Resistance in the Intensive Care Unit
Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2001; 134(4): 298 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Lipman, S. C. Wallis, and C. Rickard
Low Plasma Cefepime Levels in Critically Ill Septic Patients: Pharmacokinetic Modeling Indicates Improved Troughs with Revised Dosing
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1999; 43(10): 2559 - 2561.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. M. H. Gómez, J. J. Cordingly, and M. G. A. Palazzo
Altered Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime in Critically Ill Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 1999; 43(7): 1798 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.