Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bannister, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bannister, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 99-104, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A comparison of the penetration of cefuroxime and cephamandole into bone, fat and haematoma fluid in patients undergoing total hip replacement

AM Lovering, J Perez, KE Bowker, DS Reeves, AP MacGowan and G Bannister
Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Department of Medical Microbiology, Southmead Hospital, UK.

Twelve patients undergoing total hip anthroplasty received, at the induction of anaesthesia, cephamandole (1 g) and cefuroxime (1.5 g); further doses of cephamandole (1 g) and cefuroxime (750 mg) were given at 8 and 16 h after the operation. Routine total hip arthroplasty was performed and at timed intervals during operation samples of bone, fat and blood were collected for assay for HPLC analysis. Samples of the haematoma fluid that formed around the operation site and further blood samples were also collected at 7 and 15 h after the operation. Although considerable variation was observed in the bone and fat concentrations of both agents, the cefuroxime levels were substantially higher than those of cephamandole, with mean values for bone of cefuroxime 36.0 mg/L (95% CI 29.0-43.0 mg/L) and cephamandole 18.3 mg/L (95% CI 14.2- 22.4 mg/L) and for fat of cefuroxime 15.0 mg/L (95% CI 11.1-18.9 mg/L) and cephamandole 11.2 mg/L (95% CI 7.2-15.2 mg/L). When corrected for blood concentrations the penetration of both agents was similar (bone, 43.6% cefuroxime and 37.8% cephamandole; fat, 16.0% cefuroxime and 19.2% cephamandole). Cefuroxime concentrations in haematoma drain fluid were higher than those of cephamandole 6-8 h after the operation (17.8 versus 8.3 mg/L) but lower at 14-16 h (7.7 versus 9.6 mg/L). We conclude that there are no significant differences between the bone, fat or haematoma penetration of cefuroxime and cephamandole and that any differences in the absolute levels of the two agents are due to differences in the total drug administered rather than their ability to penetrate into these sites. Time-kill curves for cefuroxime and cephamandole against five clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus failed to identify any significant differences between the rates of kill for the two agents at the concentrations seen in bone, fat or haematoma fluid. For both prophylaxis regimens antibiotic concentrations exceeded the MICs for potential pathogens for the duration of the operation and also in the haematoma which surrounds the operation site for up to 24 h after the operation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. M. Lovering, J. Zhang, G. C. Bannister, B. J. A. Lankester, J. H. M. Brown, G. Narendra, and A. P. MacGowan
Penetration of linezolid into bone, fat, muscle and haematoma of patients undergoing routine hip replacement
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2002; 50(1): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
J. Zhang and A. M. Lovering
Difficulties in the assay of cefamandole highlight the importance of specific methodologies in pharmacokinetic studies
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2001; 48(1): 154 - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. A. Coyle, G. W. Kaatz, and M. J. Rybak
Activities of Newer Fluoroquinolones against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2001; 45(6): 1654 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. M. Lovering, T. R. Walsh, G. C. Bannister, and A. P. MacGowan
The penetration of ceftriaxone and cefamandole into bone, fat and haematoma and relevance of serum protein binding to their penetration into bone
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2001; 47(4): 483 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P. J Moss and R. G Finch
The next generation: fluoroquinolones in the management of acute lower respiratory infection in adults
Thorax, January 1, 2000; 55(1): 83 - 85.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.