Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howe, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Millar, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 13-17, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Susceptibility testing of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to carbapenems

RA Howe, MP Wilson, TR Walsh and MR Millar
Public Health Laboratory, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.

The susceptibility of 20 clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem was investigated by various methods. S. maltophilia appeared sensitive to meropenem but resistant to imipenem by disc testing in Iso-sensitest agar. Agar dilution MICs were performed using Iso-sensitest agar and with incubation under three sets of atmospheric conditions. MICs of meropenem were considerably lower than those of imipenem; this effect was maximal after incubation in 5% CO2 when the MIC of meropenem was approximately 64 times less than that of imipenem. Induction experiments showed that both carbapenems could induce production of the L1 carbapenemase. However, disc approximation tests showed that imipenem could induced resistance to meropenem. Partially stably derepressed mutants were readily selected in vitro. We conclude that, although S. maltophilia may give large zones of inhibition to meropenem on disc testing, resistant mutants are readily selected and therefore standard sensitivity tests may be poorly predictive of clinical outcome of treatment of S. maltophilia infections with meropenem.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. Valdezate, A. Vindel, E. Loza, F. Baquero, and R. Cantón
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Unique Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Clinical Strains
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2001; 45(5): 1581 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.