Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinks, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bakker, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinks, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bakker, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 40, 125-133, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Continuous infusion of ceftazidime in cystic fibrosis patients during home treatment: clinical outcome, microbiology and pharmacokinetics

AA Vinks, RW Brimicombe, HG Heijerman and W Bakker
The Hague Hospitals Central Pharmacy, The Hague, The Netherlands. kkgt@rijnhaave.nl

Acute exacerbations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections were treated with ceftazidime by continuous infusion in 17 adult patients with cystic fibrosis at home. Ceftazidime was delivered via an infusion pump and the effects of this 3 week home intravenous antibiotic treatment (HIVAT) were prospectively studied over a 2 year period. Patients with cystic fibrosis (eight male and nine female patients; mean age 26.9 +/- 7.6 years, range 15-52 years), received a total of 33 courses of continuous ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/24 h). Clinical data were collected at the start, the end and 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment in 12 patients. Ceftazidime pharmacokinetic data during continuous infusion were obtained from ten patients. The treatment was supervised by the clinician without home visits. All 25 clinically evaluable courses in 12 patients proved efficacious. The mean duration of the courses was 21 days. The entire antibiotic course was administered at home in 88% of the courses. The other 12% was started for 2-3 days as an inpatient. Objective clinical parameters significantly improved. Clinical improvement was noted in 91% of the patients, and lasted at least until 4-6 weeks after the end of the treatment in 70%. The number of cultures positive for P. aeruginosa decreased significantly during antibiotic treatment. Bacterial count returned to pretreatment values 4-6 weeks after treatment. Multiple courses of ceftazidime monotherapy did not result in a lasting increase of ceftazidime-resistant pseudomonas strains. Total body clearance was 9.1 +/- 1.3 L/h. The steady-state ceftazidime serum concentration during continuous infusion was 28.4 +/- 5.0 mg/L. Sputum concentrations were in the range of 0.5-13 mg/L (3.9 +/- 4.0 mg/L). In conclusion, HIVAT with ceftazidime administered by continuous infusion proved clinically effective and did not result in an increase in lasting resistance.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Hubert, E. Le Roux, T. Lavrut, B. Wallaert, P. Scheid, D. Manach, D. Grenet, I. Sermet-Gaudelus, S. Ramel, C. Cracowski, et al.
Continuous versus Intermittent Infusions of Ceftazidime for Treating Exacerbation of Cystic Fibrosis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2009; 53(9): 3650 - 3656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. Moriyama, S. A Henning, M. M Neuhauser, R. L Danner, and T. J Walsh
Continuous-Infusion {beta}-Lactam Antibiotics During Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration for the Treatment of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2009; 43(7): 1324 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. A. Vinks, R. N. van Rossem, R. A. A. Mathot, H. G. M. Heijerman, and J. W. Mouton
Pharmacokinetics of Aztreonam in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Cystic Fibrosis and Evaluation of Dose-Exposure Relationships Using Monte Carlo Simulation
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2007; 51(9): 3049 - 3055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. B. Bulitta, S. B. Duffull, M. Kinzig-Schippers, U. Holzgrabe, U. Stephan, G. L. Drusano, and F. Sorgel
Systematic Comparison of the Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients and Healthy Volunteers
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2007; 51(7): 2497 - 2507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
W. K. Lau, D. Mercer, K. M. Itani, D. P. Nicolau, J. L. Kuti, D. Mansfield, and A. Dana
Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Administered by Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Infusion for Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2006; 50(11): 3556 - 3561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Klekner, K. Bagyi, L. Bognar, A. Gaspar, M. Andrasi, and J. Szabo
Effectiveness of cephalosporins in the sputum of patients with nosocomial bronchopneumonia.
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2006; 44(9): 3418 - 3421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
S. M. Moskowitz, J. M. Foster, J. C. Emerson, R. L. Gibson, and J. L. Burns
Use of Pseudomonas biofilm susceptibilities to assign simulated antibiotic regimens for cystic fibrosis airway infection
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2005; 56(5): 879 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
N. Baririan, H. Chanteux, E. Viaene, H. Servais, and P. M. Tulkens
Stability and compatibility study of cefepime in comparison with ceftazidime for potential administration by continuous infusion under conditions pertinent to ambulatory treatment of cystic fibrosis patients and to administration in intensive care units
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2003; 51(3): 651 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. Lubasch, S. Luck, H. Lode, H. Mauch, J. Lorenz, P. Bolcskei, T. Welte, and the COPD study group
Optimizing ceftazidime pharmacodynamics in patients with acute exacerbation of severe chronic bronchitis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2003; 51(3): 659 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. A. Vinks, J. G. den Hollander, S. E. Overbeek, R. W. Jelliffe, and J. W. Mouton
Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Nonlinear Behavior of Piperacillin during Intermittent or Continuous Infusion in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2003; 47(2): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. Viaene, H. Chanteux, H. Servais, M.-P. Mingeot-Leclercq, and P. M. Tulkens
Comparative Stability Studies of Antipseudomonal {beta}-Lactams for Potential Administration through Portable Elastomeric Pumps (Home Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Patients) and Motor-Operated Syringes (Intensive Care Units)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2327 - 2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. P. Howden and M. J. Richards
The efficacy of continuous infusion flucloxacillin in home therapy for serious staphylococcal infections and cellulitis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2001; 48(2): 311 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.