Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teng, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teng, R.
Right arrow Articles by Vincent, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 93-97, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effect of Maalox and omeprazole on the bioavailability of trovafloxacin

R Teng, LC Dogolo, SA Willavize, HL Friedman and J Vincent
Clinical Pharmacology, Central Research Division, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT 06340, USA.

To determine the effect of the concurrent administration of Maalox and omeprazole in the bioavailability of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219), an open, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-way crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy male volunteers. Each received treatments of three 100 mg trovafloxacin tablets in the morning 30 min after 30 mL of Maalox (A), 30 min after placebo (B), 2 h before 30 mL of Maalox (C) and 2 h after 40 mg of omeprazole (D). For treatments A and C, Maalox was also given at 22.00 h the night before the study day, 1 and 3 h after meals and at bedtime on the study day. For B and D, placebo and omeprazole, respectively, were also given at 22.00 h the night before the study day. After treatments A and C, mean area under the curve (AUC) was reduced by 66% and 28% (14.2 and 30.2 mg.h/L), respectively, and mean T(1/2) declined by 33% and 31% (8.3 and 8.5 h), respectively, relative to the values after B (42.1 mg.h/L; 12.4 h). The mean Kel- corrected relative bioavailabilities for A and C were 50% and 104%, respectively, suggesting a large reduction in the initial absorption of trovafloxacin with A. Treatment D had no appreciable effect on mean T(1/2) but mean AUC and Cmax were reduced by 18% and 32%, respectively, relative to B. The mean relative bioavailability after D was 82%. We conclude that the concurrent administration of trovafloxacin and aluminium- and magnesium-containing antacids should be avoided but that co-administration with omeprazole is unlikely to have a clinically significant effect on the extent of absorption of the antibiotic.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. Cha, W. J. Brown, and M. J. Rybak
Bactericidal Activities of Daptomycin, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model with Simulated Endocardial Vegetations
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2003; 47(12): 3960 - 3963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.