Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudreau, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 707-712, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli

C Gaudreau and H Gilbert
Service de Microbiologie Medicale et Maladies Infectieuses, Hopital Saint-Luc and Universite de Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

The correlation between disc diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility testing of five antibiotics was studied against 145 Campylobacter strains: 99 Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and 46 Campylobacter coli. The percentages of true results and 95% CI for disc diffusion for resistant strains were 100% (93.2-100%) for tetracycline (53 strains tested), 100% (77.2-100%) for ciprofloxacin (13 strains tested), 86.7% (62.1-96.3%) for nalidixic acid (15 strains tested), 100% (56.6-100%) for erythromycin (five strains tested) and 68.8% (44.4-85.8%) for ampicillin (16 strains tested). The percentages of true results and 95% CI were 97.6-100% and 93.2-100% respectively for 89-140 susceptible strains to the five antibiotics tested. There was a 1.4% major error for nalidixic acid, 0.7% very major error for erythromycin, 5.5% and 1.4% minor and major errors respectively for ampicillin. There was complete agreement for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Results of ampicillin susceptibility are not expected to be useful in a clinical setting. The nalidixic acid disc is a marker of ciprofloxacin susceptibility as the nalidixic acid-susceptible strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin while most of the resistant ones were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Overall, our results suggest that disc diffusion is a reliable, easy and inexpensive susceptibility testing method for C. jejuni and C. coli for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Until more erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant strains are tested to confirm the reliability of this test, the resistance to these drugs needs to be confirmed using the Etest or the agar dilution method.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Gaudreau, Y. Girouard, H. Gilbert, J. Gagnon, and S. Bekal
Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Agar Dilution Methods for Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Tetracycline Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter coli and for Tetracycline Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2008; 52(12): 4475 - 4477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J.-S. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and S. Kathariou
Differential Effects of Temperature on Natural Transformation to Erythromycin and Nalidixic Acid Resistance in Campylobacter coli
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 74(19): 6121 - 6125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
J. I. Dasti, U. Gross, S. Pohl, R. Lugert, M. Weig, and R. Schmidt-Ott
Role of the plasmid-encoded tet(O) gene in tetracycline-resistant clinical isolates of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2007; 56(6): 833 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Gaudreau, Y. Girouard, L. Ringuette, and C. Tsimiklis
Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Agar Dilution Methods for Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1524 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Luangtongkum, T. Y. Morishita, A. B. El-Tayeb, A. J. Ison, and Q. Zhang
Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Campylobacter spp. by the Agar Dilution and the Agar Disk Diffusion Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 590 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
V. N. Kos, M. Keelan, and D. E. Taylor
Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Poultry from Alberta, Canada
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2006; 50(2): 778 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Gibreel, V. N. Kos, M. Keelan, C. A. Trieber, S. Levesque, S. Michaud, and D. E. Taylor
Macrolide Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: Molecular Mechanism and Stability of the Resistance Phenotype
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 2753 - 2759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Wittwer, J. Keller, T. M. Wassenaar, R. Stephan, D. Howald, G. Regula, and B. Bissig-Choisat
Genetic Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in a Campylobacter Population Isolated from Poultry Farms in Switzerland
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 71(6): 2840 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
A. Gibreel, D. M. Tracz, L. Nonaka, T. M. Ngo, S. R. Connell, and D. E. Taylor
Incidence of Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Isolated in Alberta, Canada, from 1999 to 2002, with Special Reference to tet(O)-Mediated Tetracycline Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2004; 48(9): 3442 - 3450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Gaudreau and H. Gilbert
Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni Strains Isolated from Humans in 1998 to 2001 in Montreal, Canada
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2003; 47(6): 2027 - 2029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
B. Ge, S. Bodeis, R. D. Walker, D. G. White, S. Zhao, P. F. McDermott, and J. Meng
Comparison of the Etest and agar dilution for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2002; 50(4): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
Y. Sáenz, M. Zarazaga, M. Lantero, M. J. Gastañares, F. Baquero, and C. Torres
Antibiotic Resistance in Campylobacter Strains Isolated from Animals, Foods, and Humans in Spain in 1997-1998
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2000; 44(2): 267 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Gaudreau and H. Gilbert
Antimicrobial Resistance of Clinical Strains of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni Isolated from 1985 to 1997 in Quebec, Canada
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 1998; 42(8): 2106 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. Tremblay and C. Gaudreau
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of 59 Strains of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 1998; 42(7): 1847 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.