Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shonekan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mildvan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shonekan, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mildvan, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 405-409, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparative in-vitro activities of RP59500 (quinupristin/dalfopristin), CL 329,998, CL 331,002, trovafloxacin, clinafloxacin, teicoplanin and vancomycin against Gram-positive bacteria

D Shonekan, S Handwerger and D Mildvan
Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY 10003, USA.

The in-vitro activities of five investigational antibiotics, RP59500 (a semisynthetic injectable streptogramin), CL 329,998 and CL 331,002 (two new glycylcyclines), trovafloxacin (a naphthyridone), and clinafloxacin (a dihalogenated quinolone), were examined and compared with those of minocycline, teicoplanin and vancomycin against 190 clinical isolates of Gram-positive cocci. The MICs for RP59500 against all isolates with the exception of Enterococcus faecalis were low. RP59500 was bactericidal against all except enterococcal isolates. CL 329,998 and CL 331,002 were significantly more active than minocycline against oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MIC90 0.25 versus 8 mg/L) and all enterococcal isolates (MIC90 0.125 versus 16 mg/L). Clinafloxacin was the most active agent against all staphylococcal isolates and was bactericidal. Trovafloxacin showed good activity against oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci and alpha-haemolytic streptococci (MIC90 < or = 0.125 mg/L). This study demonstrates the potential of the five investigational antibiotics as therapeutic agents for infections caused by Gram-positive cocci.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
I. Chopra and M. Roberts
Tetracycline Antibiotics: Mode of Action, Applications, Molecular Biology, and Epidemiology of Bacterial Resistance
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2001; 65(2): 232 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. Siami, N. Christou, I. Eiseman, K. J. Tack, and the Clinafloxacin Severe Skin And Soft Tissue Infe
Clinafloxacin versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Treatment of Patients with Severe Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2001; 45(2): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. von Eiff and G. Peters
Comparative in-vitro activities of moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and linezolid against staphylococci
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 1999; 43(4): 569 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
C. A. Johnson, C. A. Taylor III, S. W. Zimmerman, W. E. Bridson, P. Chevalier, O. Pasquier, and R. I. Baybutt
Pharmacokinetics of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 1999; 43(1): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.