Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aldridge, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aldridge, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, W. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 319-324, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of susceptibility results of the Bacteroides fragilis group and other anaerobes by traditional MIC results and statistical methods

KE Aldridge and WD Johnson
Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112, USA.

Antimicrobial susceptibility is compared by MIC values reflecting activity by weight and/or percentage of strains resistant. This study establishes these parameters in vitro in the traditional fashion and extends analysis statistically for various groups of anaerobic bacteria. Mode MIC, MIC50, MIC90 values and percentage of strains resistant indicated comparable activity for most of the beta-lactams. Geometric and arithmetic MICs suggested ceftizoxime to be the most active beta-lactam. Statistical analysis of all log2 values showed that metronidazole was the most active followed by clindamycin and that ceftizoxime was significantly more active than cefotaxime, piperacillin, ceftriaxone or cefoxitin.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. S. McMahon, J. Xu, J. E. Moore, I. S. Blair, and D. A. McDowell
Environmental Stress and Antibiotic Resistance in Food-Related Pathogens
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., January 1, 2007; 73(1): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. M. Koeth, C. E. Good, P. C. Appelbaum, E. J. C. Goldstein, A. C. Rodloff, M. Claros, and L. J. Dubreuil
Surveillance of susceptibility patterns in 1297 European and US anaerobic and capnophilic isolates to co-amoxiclav and five other antimicrobial agents
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2004; 53(6): 1039 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.