Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weller, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Selkon, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weller, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Selkon, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 251-253, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Methicillin susceptibility testing of staphylococci by Etest and comparison with agar dilution and mecA detection

TM Weller, DW Crook, MR Crow, W Ibrahim, TH Pennington and JB Selkon
Department of Medical Microbiology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, UK.

The susceptibility to methicillin of 44 Staphylococcus aureus and 120 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) was determined by Etest, agar dilution and presence of the mecA gene. There was agreement between the results of all methods when testing S. aureus. However, discrepancies occurred with CNS when cultural methods were compared with presence of the mecA gene. mecA-positive isolates tested as resistant more often with agar dilution on Columbia agar plus 5% NaCl than by Etest.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. F. J. Brown, D. I. Edwards, P. M. Hawkey, D. Morrison, G. L. Ridgway, K. J. Towner, M. W. D. Wren, and on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis
Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2005; 56(6): 1000 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
P. Kohner, J. Uhl, C. Kolbert, D. Persing, and F. Cockerill III
Comparison of Susceptibility Testing Methods with mecA Gene Analysis for Determining Oxacillin (Methicillin) Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus spp.
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 1999; 37(9): 2952 - 2961.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
F. R. Cockerill III
Genetic Methods for Assessing Antimicrobial Resistance
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 1999; 43(2): 199 - 212.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
T. M. A. Weller
The distribution of mecA, mecR1 and mecI and sequence analysis of mecI and the mec promoter region in staphylococci expressing resistance to methicillin
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 1999; 43(1): 15 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. J. Rosser, M. J. Alfa, S. Hoban, J. Kennedy, and G. K. Harding
E Test versus Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Viridans Group Streptococci
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 1999; 37(1): 26 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
N. Frebourg, D Nouet, L Lemee, E Martin, and J. Lemeland
Comparison of ATB staph, rapid ATB staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA [In Process Citation]
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 1998; 36(1): 52 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.