Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barsoum, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Setterstrom, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barsoum, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Setterstrom, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol 39, 63-69, Copyright © 1997 by The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of hypersensitivity to microencapsulated ampicillin in guinea pigs

IS Barsoum, KM Kopydlowski, P Cuenin and JA Setterstrom
US Army Dental Research Detachment, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5300, USA.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the sustained release of ampicillin from a biodegradable drug-delivery system (microencapsulated ampicillin anhydrate (MEAA)) will increase or decrease the intensity of a hypersensitivity reaction compared with that observed with free drug. Ovalbumin, which is known to elicit a marked hypersensitivity reaction in guinea pigs, and microencapsulated ovalbumin (MOVA) were tested in parallel with ampicillin and MEAA. Guinea pigs were sensitized biweekly by subcutaneous and intramuscular injections of ampicillin, MEAA, ovalbumin, MOVA or placebo microspheres (test articles), each mixed with Freund's adjuvant, and challenged 2 weeks later, intradermally, with the free compounds. In a separate set of experiments, guinea pigs were sensitized by implantation of the same agents in the caudal thigh of anaesthetized animals. Skin allergic reactions were tested at 1 and 3 weeks following local implantation of the test articles. Sera of sensitized guinea pigs were tested for specific IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and skin samples from the site of the inflammatory reaction were fixed, stained and evaluated histologically. Guinea pigs sensitized systemically with MEAA or MOVA showed smaller, but not statistically different skin allergic response than animals given corresponding free compounds. However, guinea pigs sensitized by local implantation of MEAA showed a significantly lower inflammatory response (P < 0.0001) than those given an equivalent dose of the free drug. Guinea pigs sensitized with placebo microspheres showed a low inflammatory skin reaction which was similar to those sensitized with all doses of MEAA. There was no significant difference in specific IgG antibody response in the sera of guinea pigs sensitized locally with either free or microencapsulated ampicillin or ovalbumin. Histology of skin revealed a milder inflammatory reaction with MEAA or MOVA than with ampicillin or ovalbumin, respectively. We conclude that the encapsulated ampicillin or ovalbumin and subsequent release of each agent will elicit a reduced hypersensitivity reaction in guinea pigs than will the free agent.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. P. Allen, R. Cha, and M. J. Rybak
In Vitro Activities of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin and Cefepime, Alone and in Combination with Various Antimicrobials, against Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococci and Enterococci in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2606 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. M. Eliopoulos and C. B. Wennersten
Antimicrobial Activity of Quinupristin-Dalfopristin Combined with Other Antibiotics against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2002; 46(5): 1319 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
U. Dreses-Werringloer, I. Padubrin, B. Jürgens-Saathoff, A. P. Hudson, H. Zeidler, and L. Köhler
Persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis Is Induced by Ciprofloxacin and Ofloxacin In Vitro
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2000; 44(12): 3288 - 3297.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
N. A. Cross, D. J. Kellock, G. R. Kinghorn, M. Taraktchoglou, E. Bataki, K. M. Oxley, P. M. Hawkey, and A. Eley
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Chlamydia trachomatis Using a Reverse Transcriptase PCR-Based Method
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 1999; 43(9): 2311 - 2313.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
V. Lorian and F. Fernandes
Electron microscopy studies of the bactericidal effects of quinupristin/dalfopristin on Staphylococcus aureus J Antimicrob Chemother 1999; 43: 845- 846
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 845 - 846.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.