Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tripodi, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ruggiero, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tripodi, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ruggiero, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1996) 37, 727-736
© 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Unorthodox antibiotic combinations including ciprofloxacin against high-level gentamicin resistant enterococci

M. F. Tripodia,*, R. Utilia, A. Rambaldia, A. Locatellia, P. Rosarioa, A. Floriob and G. Ruggieroa

aInstitute of Medical Therapy; Second University of Naples Via D. Cotugno 1, 80135 Naples, Italy bInstitute of Vascular Surgery, Second University of Naples Via D. Cotugno 1, 80135 Naples, Italy

Received 2 August 1995; returned 7 November 1995; accepted 7 December 1995


Development of high-level gentamicin resistance among enterococci represents a serious therapeutic problem as it precludes synergy between aminoglycosides and cell-wall active agents. As part of a search for active antibiotic combinations against enterococci with high-level gentamicin resistance, we tested by the time kill curve method the efficacy of ciprofloxacin combined with ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, vancomycin or teicoplanin against ten isolates of Enterococcus faecium, three of Enterococcus casseliflavus and 13 of Enterococcus faecalis that exhibited a MIC of gentamicin ≥2000 mg/L. Most of the E. faecium were also resistant to ampicillin and to ciprofloxacin. The combination of ciprofloxacin with ampicillin was bactericidal against five of seven E. faecium strains that exhibited a ciprofloxacin MIC 4≤mg/L, but was inactive against the three E. faecium that were highly resistant to ciprofloxacin. This combination was also bactericidal against the E. casseliflavus and all the E. faecalis strains. The combination of ciprofloxacin with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole was bactericidal against five of the seven E. faecium and seven of the nine E. faecalis strains with a ciprofloxacin MIC ≤4mg/L. No bactericidal activity of this combination was seen against the enterococci that were highly resistant to either ciprofloxacin or to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole. The combination of ciprofloxacin with glycopeptides was inactive against E. faecium and E. casseliflavus and against E. faecalis, it was either ineffective or antagonistic; in only one case it was bactericidal. Five strains of E. faecium were resistant to all antibiotic combinations tested.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. F. Tripodi, A. Rambaldi, G. Sarnataro, E. Ragone, and R. Utili
The effects of the level of ampicillin resistance and the inoculum size on the in-vitro bactericidal activity of the combination of ampicillin and ciprofloxacin against high-level gentamicin-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 1999; 44(5): 719 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. M. Coque, K. V. Singh, G. M. Weinstock, and B. E. Murray
Characterization of Dihydrofolate Reductase Genes from Trimethoprim-Susceptible and Trimethoprim-Resistant Strains of Enterococcus faecalis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 1999; 43(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.