Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacLoughlin, G. J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Palma, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacLoughlin, G. J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Palma, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1996) 37, 565-573
© 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Cefpodoxime proxetil suspension compared with cefaclor suspension for treatment of acute otitis media in paediatric patients

G. J. Fernández MacLoughlina,*, D. Gomez Barretob, C. de la Torreb, E. A. Pinettac, F. del Castillod and L. Palmae

aPAIDEIA, Centro de Pediatria Cerviño 3900 3° piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina bHospital Infantil de México, "Federico Gomez" Mexico cHospital "Nuestra Señora del Pilar" Guatemala dPaediatric Department, Hospital La Paz Madrid, Spain eDepartment of ORL, Hospital Pereyra Rossel Montevideo, Uruguay

Received 1 March 1995; returned 6 September 1995; accepted 12 October 1995


*Tel: +54 1 802 2726: Fax: +54 1 807 0642

A multicentre open-label, randomised trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of cefpodoxime proxetil bd and cefaclor tds in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. A total of 167 children aged from 1 month to 11 years were enrolled in five centres: 78 treated with cefpodoxime and 83 treated with cefaclor, were evaluated in the ITT analysis. After tympanocentesis and culture of middle ear fluid, a pathogen was isolated from 85 (53%) of the 161 evaluable patients for the ITT analysis. The organisms isolated were as follows: Streptococcus pneumoniae: (n = 33, 37.5%); Haemophilus influenzae: (n = 22, 25%); Staphylococcus aureus: (n = 15, 17.1%); Streptococcus pvogenes: (n = 8, 9.1%); Moraxella catarrhalis: (n = 2, 2.3%); others (n = 6, 6.8%).

Success (defined as a satisfactory clinical outcome, either cure or improvement) was achieved at the end of treatment, in 93.6% of the patients in the cefpodoxime group and 91.6% of the patients in the cefaclor group (P > 0.05).

Clinical recurrence was identified at the follow-up visit (30 days after inclusion), in 6.4% of the cefpodoxime-treated patients and 7.2% of the cefaclor-treated patients (P > 0.05).

The drugs were well tolerated by 78/79 (99%) of patients in the cefpodoxime-treated group and 80/85 (94%) in the cefaclor-treated group. The incidence of adverse effects was higher in the cefaclor group than in the cefpodoxime group, but this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

In conclusion, cefpodoxime proxetil administered bd is as effective as cefaclor administered tds in the treatment of acute otitis media in children. The less frequent dosing schedule of cefpodoxime (bd) compared with cefaclor (tds) appears to be more convenient for the treatment of the infections in children.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
S. M. Chandler, S. M. S. Garcia, and D. P. McCormick
Consistency of Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Otitis Media: A Review of the Recent Literature
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 46(2): 99 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. L. Kozyrskyj, G. E. Hildes-Ripstein, S. E. A. Longstaffe, J. L. Wincott, D. S. Sitar, T. P. Klassen, and M. E. K. Moffatt
Treatment of Acute Otitis Media With a Shortened Course of Antibiotics: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, June 3, 1998; 279(21): 1736 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.