Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legrand, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bolard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legrand, P.
Right arrow Articles by Bolard, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1996) 37, 519-533
© 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Comparative internalization and recycling of different amphotericin B formulations by a macrophage-like cell line

P. Legrand, A. Vertut-Doi and J. Bolard*

L.P.B.C. (URA CNRS 2056), Universite Pierre et Marie Curie 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

Received 17 February 1995; returned 27 July 1995; accepted 31 October 1995


*Corresponding author

The amount of amphotericin B (AmB) associated with cultured murine macrophage-like J774 cells, after incubation with various AmB lipid formulations, was determined by absorption spectroscopy. Large, negatively charged, AmB-containing, multilamellar vesicles and small cholesteryl sulphate-AmB complexes both enhanced the amount of AmB associated with J774 cells at 37°C (up to 500-fold the extracellular concentration). In contrast, AmB-containing, small, negatively charged vesicles (AmBisome), positively charged, oligolamellar vesicles and mixed micelles showed a lower association of the antibiotic with cells, compared with AmB added from a solution in dimethylsulphoxide or Fungizone. Experiments performed at 4°C showed a large reduction of AmB uptake for AmB preparations and AmB added from a solution in dimethysulphoxide or Fungizone, suggesting a high percentage of internalization of the antibiotic. Experiments in the presence of cytochalasin B resulted in a decrease of AmB uptake mainly for the preparations of large diameter, suggesting that these formulations were taken up by phagocytosis. A comparative study with Chinese hamster ovary cells, a model of non-phagocytic cells, snowed a reduction in the take up of AmB. This reduction was always more marked when AmB was incorporated in lipid formulations. On the other hand, accumulation of the antibiotic in J774 cells was shown to be followed by its release from the cells in an unbound form, the extent of release depending on the type of vector used. The results suggest that in some cases macrophages can be considered as reservoirs of antibiotic, releasing free AmB in the medium.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Takemoto, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Ueda, Y. Sumita, K. Yoshida, and Y. Niki
Comparative study on the efficacy of AmBisome and Fungizone in a mouse model of pulmonary aspergillosis
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2006; 57(4): 724 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
R. R. Razonable, M. Henault, L. N. Lee, C. Laethem, P. A. Johnston, H. L. Watson, and C. V. Paya
Secretion of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines during Amphotericin B Exposure Is Mediated by Coactivation of Toll-Like Receptors 1 and 2
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2005; 49(4): 1617 - 1621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
L. Maes, D. V. Berghe, N. Germonprez, L. Quirijnen, P. Cos, N. De Kimpe, and L. Van Puyvelde
In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of a Triterpenoid Saponin Extract (PX-6518) from the Plant Maesa balansae against Visceral Leishmania Species
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2004; 48(1): 130 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Cheron, C. Petit, J. Bolard, and F. Gaboriau
Heat-induced reformulation of amphotericin B-deoxycholate favours drug uptake by the macrophage-like cell line J774
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2003; 52(6): 904 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. S. Espuelas, P. Legrand, M. A. Campanero, M. Appel, M. Cheron, C. Gamazo, G. Barratt, and J. M. Irache
Polymeric carriers for amphotericin B: in vitro activity, toxicity and therapeutic efficacy against systemic candidiasis in neutropenic mice
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2003; 52(3): 419 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
M. Larabi, P. Legrand, M. Appel, S. Gil, M. Lepoivre, J.-P. Devissaguet, F. Puisieux, and G. Barratt
Reduction of NO Synthase Expression and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Production in Macrophages by Amphotericin B Lipid Carriers
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2001; 45(2): 553 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. Kuhara, K. Uchida, and H. Yamaguchi
Therapeutic Efficacy of Human Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Used Alone and in Combination with Antifungal Agents, in Mice with Systemic Candida albicans Infection
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2000; 44(1): 19 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
E. W. M. van Etten, W. van Vianen, J. Hak, and I. A. J. M. Bakker-Woudenberg
Activity of Liposomal Amphotericin B with Prolonged Circulation in Blood versus Those of AmBisome and Fungizone against Intracellular Candida albicans in Murine Peritoneal Macrophages
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 1998; 42(9): 2437 - 2439.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.