Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1996) 37, 265-273
© 1996 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E test: comparison with the broth macrodilution technique

Sharon C. A. Chen, Maryann L. O'Donnell, Suzannah Gordon and Gwendolyn L. Gilbert

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia

Received 19 April 1995; returned 23 June 1995; accepted 2 August 1995


The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing was compared with the E test by testing 86 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. The MIC agreement rates for the two methods for Candida spp. were 73–89% within ± 1 doubling dilution and 87–100% within ±2 dilutions. For C. neoformans, agreement within±1 dilution was>70% for all the agents tested except fluconazole for which agreement was 35%. Our data support the further evaluation of the E test as an alternative method for antifungal susceptibility testing. However, E test MICs of fluconazole for C. neoformans, particularly C. neoformans var. gattii should be interpreted with caution, as falsely elevated MICs may occur.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
G. R. Thompson III, A. W. Fothergill, N. P. Wiederhold, A. C. Vallor, B. L. Wickes, and T. F. Patterson
Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Isavuconazole MICs against Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2008; 52(8): 2959 - 2961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. J. Maxwell, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, D. J. Diekema, and M. A. Pfaller
Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Voriconazole and Amphotericin B MICs for 162 Clinical Isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 97 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones
Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Caspofungin (MK-0991) Susceptibilities of 726 Clinical Isolates of Candida Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2001; 39(12): 4387 - 4389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Chryssanthou
Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility among Swedish Candida Species Bloodstream Isolates from 1994 to 1998: Comparison of the E-test and the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the NCCLS M27-A Reference Method
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2001; 39(11): 4181 - 4183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
J. H. Rex, M. A. Pfaller, T. J. Walsh, V. Chaturvedi, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. A. Ghannoum, L. L. Gosey, F. C. Odds, M. G. Rinaldi, D. J. Sheehan, et al.
Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Practical Aspects and Current Challenges
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2001; 14(4): 643 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. A. Petrou and D. C. Shanson
Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans by the NCCLS microdilution and Etest methods using five defined media
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2000; 46(5): 815 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, A. Houston, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones
Evaluation of the Etest Method for Determining Voriconazole Susceptibilities of 312 Clinical Isolates of Candida Species by Using Three Different Agar Media
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2000; 38(10): 3715 - 3717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Cantón, J. Pemán, A. Carrillo-Muñoz, A. Orero, P. Ubeda, A. Viudes, and M. Gobernado
Fluconazole Susceptibilities of Bloodstream Candida sp. Isolates as Determined by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Method M27-A and Two Other Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 1999; 37(7): 2197 - 2200.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Szekely, E. M. Johnson, and D. W. Warnock
Comparison of E-Test and Broth Microdilution Methods for Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Testing of Molds
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 1999; 37(5): 1480 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
W. R. Kirkpatrick, T. M. Turner, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, S. W. Redding, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson
Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Candida Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 1998; 36(11): 3429 - 3432.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, A. Karlsson, and A. Bolmström
Evaluation of the Etest Method for Determining Fluconazole Susceptibilities of 402 Clinical Yeast Isolates by Using Three Different Agar Media
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 1998; 36(9): 2586 - 2589.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
W. R. Kirkpatrick, R. K. McAtee, S. G. Revankar, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson
Comparative Evaluation of National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Broth Macrodilution and Agar Dilution Screening Methods for Testing Fluconazole Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 1998; 36(5): 1330 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.