Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colombo, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, M. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1995) 36, 93-100
© 1995 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Evaluation of the E test system versus a microtitre broth method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts against fluconazole and itraconazole

Arnaldo L. Colomboa,b,*, Francesco Barchiesia,c, Deanna A. McGougha, Annette W. Fothergilla and Michael G. Rinaldia

aFungus Testing Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Texas-Health Science Center at San Antonio USA bEscola Paulista de Medicina São Paulo, Brazil cIstituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Ancona Italy

Received 17 May 1994; returned 5 December 1994; accepted 31 January 1995


*Corresponding author's address: Dr Arnaldo Lopes Colombo, Disciplina de Doencas Infecciosas c Parasitarias, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Botucatu, 740; CEP: 04023-062, Sào Paulo-SP, Brazil; Phone: + 55-(11)-572 6348; Fax: + 55-(11)-549 2127

The E test strip (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) as an antimicrobial susceptibility testing method is a new and promising tool with broad application in microbiology. This method is less labour intensive than broth dilution methods and may be useful for testing individual clinical isolates.

In contrast to several publications comparing E test antibacterial strips with NCCLS reference methods, there is littleinformation about the performance of E test antifungal strips. This study compared fluconazole and itraconazole MICs obtained by E test with a microbroth dilution method performed to NCCLS guidelines.

Fluconazole and itraconazole E test results exhibited good correlation with the broth microdilution (82% and 81% agreement within ±1 two-fold dilution, respectively). The E test is easy to perform and generates MICs for Candida species in 24 h.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. K. Mukherjee, D. J. Sheehan, C. A. Hitchcock, and M. A. Ghannoum
Combination Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2005; 18(1): 163 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
C. Castro, M. C. Serrano, B. Flores, A. Espinel-Ingroff, and E. Martin-Mazuelos
Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with a Modified NCCLS M38-A Method To Determine the Activity of Voriconazole against Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus spp.
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 42(9): 4358 - 4360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. C. Rubio, J. Gil, I. R. de Ocariz, R. Benito, and A. Rezusta
Comparison of Results Obtained by Testing with Three Different Agar Media and by the NCCLS M27-A Method for In Vitro Testing of Fluconazole against Candida spp.
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 41(6): 2665 - 2668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones
Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Caspofungin (MK-0991) Susceptibilities of 726 Clinical Isolates of Candida Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2001; 39(12): 4387 - 4389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones
Evaluation of Etest Method for Determining Posaconazole MICs for 314 Clinical Isolates of Candida Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2001; 39(11): 3952 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. P. Hawser, C. Jessup, J. Vitullo, and M. A. Ghannoum
Utility of 2,3-Bis(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-Sulfophenyl)-5-[(Phenyl-Amino)Carbonyl]-2H-Tetrazolium Hydroxide (XTT) and Minimum Effective Concentration Assays in the Determination of Antifungal Susceptibility of Aspergillus fumigatus to the Lipopeptide Class of Compounds
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2001; 39(7): 2738 - 2741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
G. Kronvall and I. Karlsson
Fluconazole and Voriconazole Multidisk Testing of Candida Species for Disk Test Calibration and MIC Estimation
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2001; 39(4): 1422 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S.-C. Lee, C.-P. Fung, N. Lee, L.-C. See, J.-S. Huang, C.-J. Tsai, K.-S. Chen, and W.-B. Shieh
Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Test with Methylene Blue- and Glucose-Enriched Mueller-Hinton Agar for Determining Susceptibility of Candida Species
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2001; 39(4): 1615 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
A. I. Aller, E. Martin-Mazuelos, M. J. Gutierrez, S. Bernal, M. Chavez, and F. J. Recio
Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 2000; 46(6): 997 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, A. Houston, K. Mills, A. Bolmstrom, and R. N. Jones
Evaluation of the Etest Method for Determining Voriconazole Susceptibilities of 312 Clinical Isolates of Candida Species by Using Three Different Agar Media
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2000; 38(10): 3715 - 3717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Szekely, E. M. Johnson, and D. W. Warnock
Comparison of E-Test and Broth Microdilution Methods for Antifungal Drug Susceptibility Testing of Molds
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 1999; 37(5): 1480 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
E. Martin-Mazuelos, M. J. Gutierrez, A. I. Aller, S. Bernal, M. A. Martinez, O. Montero, and G. Quindos
A comparative evaluation of Etest and broth microdilution methods for fluconazole and itraconazole susceptibility testing of Candida spp.
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 1999; 43(4): 477 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Pfaller, S. A. Messer, A. Karlsson, and A. Bolmström
Evaluation of the Etest Method for Determining Fluconazole Susceptibilities of 402 Clinical Yeast Isolates by Using Three Different Agar Media
J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 1998; 36(9): 2586 - 2589.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. P. Hawser, H. Norris, C. J. Jessup, and M. A. Ghannoum
Comparison of a 2,3-Bis(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-Sulfophenyl)-5-[(Phenylamino)Carbonyl]-2H-Tetrazolium Hydroxide (XTT) Colorimetric Method with the Standardized National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Method of Testing Clinical Yeast Isolates for Susceptibility to Antifungal Agents
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 1998; 36(5): 1450 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.