Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amyes, S. G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lawrie, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amyes, S. G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lawrie, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1994) 34, 639-648
© 1994 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

A multicentre study of the in-vitro activity of cefotaxime, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against blood and urinary pathogens

S. G. B. Amyesa, D. R. Bairdb, D. W. Crookc, S. H. Gillespled, A. J. Howarde, B. A. Oppenhiemf, S. J. Pedlerg, A. Paullh, D. S. Tompkinsi and S. A. Lawriej

aScottish Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh bDepartment of Bacteriology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary Glasgow cDepartment of Microbiology, John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford dDivision of Communicable Diseases, The Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine London eDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Gwynedd Hospital Bangor fMicrobiology Department, Withington Hospital Manchester gDepartment of Microbiology, The Royal Victoria Infirmary Newcastle upon Tyne hDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales Cardiff iDepartment of Microbiology, Bradford Royal Infirmary Bradford jRoussel Laboratories Ltd. Broadwater Park, North Orbital Road, Denham, Middlesex, UK

Received 12 August 1993; accepted 14 July 1994


The in-vitro susceptibilities of aerobic bacteria isolated from 1804 blood and 4529 urine specimens collected at nine hospitals in the UK were examined. An agar dilution method was used to determine the MICs of each isolate to three cephalosporins, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and ceftazidime, and to two fluoroquinolones, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Sensitivities were then calculated using British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy recommended breakpoints.

Of the cephalosporins tested cefotaxime was the most active against the Enterobacteriaceae. All the systemic staphylococcus isolates collected were sensitive to both cefotaxime and cefuroxime. As expected, ceftazidime was the only cephalosporin active against the Pseudomonas isolates.

Both quinolones were highly active against the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. They also demonstrated good Gram-positive activity, particularly against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
K. Hryniewicz, K. Szczypa, A. Sulikowska, K. Jankowski, K. Betlejewska, and W. Hryniewicz
Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from urinary tract infections in Poland
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2001; 47(6): 773 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. Mombelli, R. Pezzoli, G. Pinoja-Lutz, R. Monotti, C. Marone, and M. Franciolli
Oral vs Intravenous Ciprofloxacin in the Initial Empirical Management of Severe Pyelonephritis or Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Arch Intern Med, January 11, 1999; 159(1): 53 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.