Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wettengel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Waardenburg, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wettengel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Waardenburg, F. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1993) 31, 963-972
© 1993 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


other

Clarithromycin versus cefaclor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate acute bacterial bronchitis

Ralf Wettengela, Norbert Vetterb and F. M. Waardenburgc

aKarl-Hansen-Klinik, Antoniusstrasse 19, D-4792, Bad Lippspringe, Germany bpulmologisches Zentrum der Stadt Wien, Vienna, Austria cKerkelandelaan 3C, Hilverswn The Netherlands

Received 17 September 1991; accepted 3 February 1993


Four hundred and eight outpatients with the clinical signs and symptoms of mild-tomoderate acute bronchitis of bacterial aetiology were enrolled in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of clarithromycin and cefaclor, both administered orally. Two hundred and seven patients received clarithromycin 250 mg bd and 201 patients received cefaclor 500 mg tds for a maximum of seven days. Clinical and bacteriological evaluations were performed before treatment was initiated, during the course of treatment, and within 72 h of completing therapy; all adverse events were recorded. Two hundred and three patients in the clarithromycin group and 195 in the cefaclor group were evaluable for clinical response and 129 and 124 patients in the clarithromycin and cefaclor groups, respectively, were evaluable for bacteriological response. The clinical response rates three to five days after starting treatment and at the post-treatment assessment were 97% (193/199) and 99· (202/203), respectively, for the clarithromycin group and 97·4% (187/192) and 97·9% (191/195), respectively, for the cefaclor group. The bacteriological cure rates were 94·6% (122/129) for the clarithromycin group and 90·3% (112/124) for the cefaclor group. None of the differences between the groups was statistically significant. Adverse events, which were generally mild and predominantly related to the gastrointestinal tract, were reported by 5·8% of clarithro mycin-treated patients and 10·4% of cefaclor-treated patients. Adverse reactions caused one patient in the clarithromycin group and three in the cefaclor group to discontinue treatment prematurely. The results of this study indicate that clarithro mycin and cefaclor are comparable with respect to efficacy and safety when used as treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate acute bacterial bronchitis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
D. G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, J. P. A. Ioannidis, P. Chew, and J. Lau
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the comparative efficacy and safety of azithromycin against other antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infections
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., November 1, 2001; 48(5): 691 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.