Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1993) 31, 949-961
© 1993 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


other

Loracarbef versus doxycycline in the treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis

Scandinavian Study Group*

Received 10 March 1992; accepted 11 January 1993


*Correspondence to: Prof. C. E. Nord, Department of Microbiology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, S-l41 86 Huddinge, Sweden

In a double-blind, multicentre study, 662 patients with acute maxillary sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive either loracarbef 400 mg bd (332 patients) or doxycycine, 200 mg for the first dose followed by 100 mg od, (330 patients) for ten days. One hundred and sixty-eight patients in the loracarbef group and 164 in the doxycycline group were evaluable for efficacy. Streptococcus pneumoniae and/or Haemophilus influenzae were isolated from approximately 75% of patients. The clinical response rate (cure or improvement) was significantly higher for patients receiving loracarbef (98·2%) than for those who received doxycycline (92·2%). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to bacteriological outcome, although more of the pre-treatment isolates were resistant to doxycycline (35 strains) than to loracarbef (five strains). Adverse events related to the gastrointestinal tract occurred in 11·7% and 10·6% of loracarbef- and doxycycline-treated patients respectively; therapy was terminated prematurely in ten patients in the loracarbef group and in nine in the doxycycline group. The results indicate that loracarbef is effective and safe treatment for acute maxillary sinusitis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
J. M. Conry and D. Castanheira
Management of Acute and Chronic Sinusitis in Adult Patients
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2003; 16(5): 335 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.