Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, S. C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1992) 30, 811-820
© 1992 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Australia

Sharon C. A. Chen, Thomas Gottlieb, Jennifer M. Palmer, Garbrielle Morris and Gwendolyn L. Gilbert

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital Westmead NSW 2145, Australia

Received 18 February 1992; accepted 14 July 1992


Correspondence to: Professor G. L. Gilbert

The susceptibilities of 900 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria to 14 antimicrobial agents were determined by an agar dilution technique. Chloramphenicol, imipenem and metronidazole were found to be active against virtually all of the strains; only a single Bacreroides fragilis isolate was resistant to both imipenem and metronidazole. The addition of clavulanic acid to amoxycillin and ticarcillin potentiated the activities of these agents against all anaerobes including members of the B.fragilis group. Ampicillin/sulbactam and clindamycin were the next most active agents. 91 and 89% of isolates respectively being susceptible.

Seventy-three per cent of the bacteria tested were susceptible to cefoxitin and 65% to cefotetan, with the MICs of almost 50% of the isolates clustering between 16 and 32 mg/L. There was also clustering around the breakpoint (64 mg/L) of piperacillin. Azithromycin exhibited poor activity against the B. fragilis group; only 18% of isolates were susceptible to ≤4 mg/L. However, 92% of non-B. fragilis Bacteroidess group strains were susceptible to this agent. We conclude that imipenem, metronidazole, chloramphenicol, ticarcillin/clavulanate, co-amoxiclav and, to a lesser extent, ampicillin/sulbactam are suitable as empirical therapy for infections caused by anaerobic bacteria.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.