Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1990) 25, 263-268
© 1990 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

In-vivo evaluation of ofloxacin in Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice

K. P. Fu*, J. Hilliard, D. Isaacson, A. J. Tobia, M. E. Rosenthale and J. L. McGuire

Research Laboratories, R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute Raritan, NJ., USA

Received 24 June 1989; accepted 25 September 1989


*Correspondence to: Dr K. P. Fu, Microbiology Department, R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, New Jersey, 08869-0602, USA

The effects of ofloxacin in Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice were compared with those of ciprofloxacin, ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Oral administration of ofloxacin at 10, 50 or 100 mg/kg once per day for seven days significantly (P < 0·02) increased survival (20·1 days at 100 mg/kg) of infected mice relative to non-treated controls (4·1 days). In addition, after oral treatment with 100 mg/kg of each of the antibiotics, ofloxacin was significantly more effective than ampicillin (9·9 days), chloramphenicol (8·4 days) or ciprofloxacin (14·9 days) in prolonging the mean survival time of these mice. A comparison of oral potencies indicates that ofloxacin is five times more potent than ciprofloxacin (oral ED50 =13·3 mg/kg vs ciprofloxacin = 69·9 mg/kg) and over eight times more potent than either of the other two antibiotics. When the number of bacteria from livers and spleens was quantitated, only ofloxacin (25 or 100 mg/kg, po) significantly (P < 0·02) reduced the number of viable bacteria in both of these tissues in comparison with untreated controls, and, relative to the other antibiotics, ofloxacin (100 mg/kg) caused a significantly greater reduction. Single oral dosing of 20 mg/kg of either ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin showed that ofloxacin achieves approximately a four-fold higher peak serum or liver concentration than ciprofloxacin, which may contribute to its better efficacy in this infection model. These results taken together suggest that oral ofloxacin may be of value in treating systemic salmonella infections in humans.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Niwa, Y. Kanamori, K. Hotta, H. Matsuno, O. Kozawa, S. Fujimoto, and T. Uematsu
Priming by grepafloxacin on respiratory burst of human neutrophils: its possible mechanism
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., October 1, 2002; 50(4): 469 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Vazifeh, A. Bryskier, and M.-T. Labro
Mechanism Underlying Levofloxacin Uptake by Human Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 1999; 43(2): 246 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.