Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, A.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, A.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1986) 18, 163-169
© 1986 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

The in-vitro activity of CI-934 compared with that of other new 4-quinolones and nalidixic acid

Anna King, Kevin Shannon, Jayne Slegg and Ian Phillips

Department of Microbiology, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals, St Thomas's Campus London SE1 7EH, England

accepted 10 February 1986


The in-vitro activity of CI-934, a new 4-quinolone compound, was compared with that of the other new 4-quinolones, enoxacin and ciprofloxacin, and also with that of nalidixic acid.

CI-934 was more active than any of the other 4-quinolones tested against Grampositive aerobic organisms including Staphylococcus aureus (MICs 0.06–0.25 mg/1).ß-haemolytic streptococci (MICs 0.12–0.5 mg/1), Streptococcus pneumoniae (MICs 0.25–0.5 m1/1), viridans streptococci (MICs 0.06–0.5 mg/1) and most enterococci (MICs 0.12–0.5 mg/1), although some ampicillin-resistant isolates of Strm faecium were slightly less susceptible (MICs 2 mg/1).

All three of the newer 4-quinolones tested were highly active against Enterobacteriaceae, Aeromonas sp., Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MICs mostly < 1 mg/1). The other Gram-negative aerobes tested were in general somewhat less susceptible, although for Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MICs seldom exceeded 8 mg/1. CI-934 was more active than enoxacin against Gardnerella vaginalis (MICs 1–8 mg/1) although it was a little less active than ciprofloxacin.

Bacteroides species (including about half of the fragilis group) were susceptible to CI-934 (MICs mostly 1–8 mg/1): ciprofloxacin had similar activity but enoxacin was less active. Other anaerobes tested were mostly highly susceptible to CI-934 (MICs 1 mg/1 or less) but were somewhat less susceptible to enoxacin and ciprofloxacin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.