Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1986) 17, 255-262
© 1986 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

A comparison of the homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) autocarousel and quantitative single test (QST) systems with the radioenzymatic assay

C. Warren and I. Phillips

Department of Microbiology, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospitals Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, England

accepted 28 August 1985


A comparison was made of three methods for gentamicin assay; (i) a modification of the radioenzymatic transferase technique, which was used as the reference method; (ii) EMIT autocarousel; and (iii) EMIT quantitative single test (QST). Correlation of both EMIT systems with the radioenzymatic method and with each other gave acceptable correlation coefficients, 0.955–0.975, for the range of concentrations tested. The coefficients of variation for within assay studies were between 3.3 and 4.9 for all three methods. Both EMIT systems provided rapid results, within minutes, albeit at a higher cost than the radioenzymatic assay. The radioenzymatic technique although cheaper with regard to the cost of materials involves considerably more technical time and effort and might not be considered suitable for samples received out-of-hours. However the combination of both EMIT systems provides facilities for batch and one-off sample tests and the ease of operation and rapid results are suited to out-of-hours operation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.