Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neu, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Labthavikul, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neu, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Labthavikul, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (1985) 16, 305-313
© 1985 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy


research-article

The in-vitro activity of a novel penem FCE 22101 compared to other ß-lactam antibiotics

Harold C. Neu, Nai Xun Chin and Pornpen Labthavikul

Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University New York, New York 10032, U.S.A.

accepted 21 December 1984


FCE 22101 is a penem antibiotic which inhibits the majority of Enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae at concentrations of 0·5–4 mg/1. It inhibits staphylococci, haemolytic streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae at ≤ 0·25 mg/1. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas species are resistant. Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium species are inhibited by ≤ 1 mg/1. FCE 22101 is not hydrolyzed by the common plasmid and chrosmosomal ß-lactamases. It shows minimal discrepancy between MIC and MBC values and there is minimal effect of inoculum size. Although FCE 22101 is generally less active against Enterobacteriaceae than are cefotaxime and ceftazidime, it does inhibit some Enterobacter spp. resistant to these agents. FCE 22101 and imipenem are similar in activity against Gram-positive and anaerobic species.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Okamoto, N. Gotoh, and T. Nishino
Extrusion of Penem Antibiotics by Multicomponent Efflux Systems MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2696 - 2699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Okamoto, N. Gotoh, and T. Nishino
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Reveals High Intrinsic Resistance to Penem Antibiotics: Penem Resistance Mechanisms and Their Interplay
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2001; 45(7): 1964 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
T. Inui, T. Oshida, T. Endo, and T. Matsushita
Potent Bacteriolytic Activity of Ritipenem Associated with a Characteristic Profile of Affinities for Penicillin-Binding Proteins of Haemophilus influenzae
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1999; 43(10): 2534 - 2537.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.